[Wittrs] Re: [C] Re: Free Will and Wittgenstein
- From: kirby urner <kirby.urner@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:48:36 -0700
> In Zettel, he makes passing reference to some issues related
> tangentially.
>
> 610. I saw this man years ago: now I have seen him again, I recognize
> him, I remember his name. And why does
> there have to be a cause of this remembering in my nervous system? Why
> must something or other, whatever it may
> be, be stored up there in any form? Why must a trace have been left
> behind? Why should there not be a
> psychological regularity to which no physiological regularity
> corresponds? If this upsets our concepts of causality
> then it is high time they were upset.
>
Ah excellent, so that's where that quote is! I've been looking for
that for some time, based on faded memories.
> An essay by Duncan Richter, available online, compares and contrasts the
> attitudes of Wittgenstein and Carnap toward Heidegger.
>
> http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:XOA-R_4oOWIJ:web.abo.fi/fak/hf/filosofi/fsemi/papers/07_03_19.doc+carnap+wittgenstein+heidegger&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgdpgQy8c3k4_6nD50QVS7xbuONjif1xDPvh_gP8fVQmKuz3APUl1f5x6Iw9i-Pqy-Vis1g-6_-YulDlqE-gNk9hVE98Gy0dgzFyUmdk9FaWBvLLLd5dKaRIdEWxJV-IraztSjm&sig=AHIEtbSCLgYYAwySo_HmgYDaCDyK_yW2jA&pli=1
>
I'm gonna read this next, when I get back from the Daime House (a
place in my blogs).
Good discussion!
Kirby
Other related posts:
