RE: [tuning-math] A 5-limit, "geometric" temperament list

It might be useful, or at least fun, to specify exactly *which* flavors of
these temperaments we're evaluating. For example, "meantone" really is
7/26-comma meantone, right? And pelogic is 7/26-limma pelogic, yes?

Also, didn't we decide to refer to "quadrafourths" as "negri" instead?

Sorry, i'm behind on the posts here, so just jumping in -- but i'm willing
to go with euclidean geometric complexity if it's something that can
actually be *seen* in a picture or model of the lattice space. Can anyone
make a diagram for a couple of temperaments (say a 5-limit and a 7-limit,
both linear) that *show* it (geometric complexity) explicitly?

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Lumma [mailto:carl@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:39 PM
To: tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tuning-math] A 5-limit, "geometric" temperament list


>> augmented
>> meantone
>> diminished
>> pelogic
>> porcupine
>> magic
>> kleismic
>> diaschismic
>> quadrafourths
>> schismic
>> orwell
>> miracle
>
>Quadrafourths is still just a smidgen over my latest badness limit.
>Should I boost it again? Is this list in some kind of order, by the way?

Did you read my post?

-Carl

____________________________________________________________

To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe,
unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the subject line "info tuning-math".  Or visit the
website:  < http://www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .


____________________________________________________________

To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe,
unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the subject line "info tuning-math".  Or visit the
website:  < http://www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .

Other related posts: