It might be useful, or at least fun, to specify exactly *which* flavors of these temperaments we're evaluating. For example, "meantone" really is 7/26-comma meantone, right? And pelogic is 7/26-limma pelogic, yes? Also, didn't we decide to refer to "quadrafourths" as "negri" instead? Sorry, i'm behind on the posts here, so just jumping in -- but i'm willing to go with euclidean geometric complexity if it's something that can actually be *seen* in a picture or model of the lattice space. Can anyone make a diagram for a couple of temperaments (say a 5-limit and a 7-limit, both linear) that *show* it (geometric complexity) explicitly? -----Original Message----- From: Carl Lumma [mailto:carl@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:39 PM To: tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [tuning-math] A 5-limit, "geometric" temperament list >> augmented >> meantone >> diminished >> pelogic >> porcupine >> magic >> kleismic >> diaschismic >> quadrafourths >> schismic >> orwell >> miracle > >Quadrafourths is still just a smidgen over my latest badness limit. >Should I boost it again? Is this list in some kind of order, by the way? Did you read my post? -Carl ____________________________________________________________ To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe, unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the subject line "info tuning-math". Or visit the website: < //www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > . ____________________________________________________________ To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe, unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the subject line "info tuning-math". Or visit the website: < //www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .