>I think that 135/128 (aka "pelogic") is one of the more interesting / >useful temperaments despite its errors. Once you get beyond a certain >level of complexity in the unison vector, you might as well use JI. >It's hard to imagine a piece of music that wanders around the lattice >enough to be able to take advantage of the (3)^35/(2)^16/(5)^17, repeated >enough times to magnify the 1 cent difference into something that would >have been easily audible. Pelogic on the other hand has a nice 9-note >subset with musically interesting melodic and harmonic properties. I agree. I tried to make this point some time ago -- that while flat badness may show interesting patterns in series of temperaments, a more musically useful badness would produces a finite list of temperaments, favoring simple ones. One might even say that from a musical standpoint complexity and error should be separate. Gene, your last 5-limit list seemed to have to hard limit complexity and error in addition to the badness limit of 3000, yes? >My short list of "best" / most useful 5-limit temperaments would go >something like this: > >meantone 81/80 >augmented 128/125 >diminished 648/625 >Blackwood decatonic 256/243 >porcupine 250/243 >diaschismic 2048/2025 >pelogic 135/128 >MAGIC 3125/3072 >schismic 32805/32768 >kleismic 15625/15552 >orwell 2109375/2097152 Is that in order? It's a lot like my list... augmented meantone diminished pelogic porcupine magic kleismic diaschismic quadrafourths schismic orwell miracle ...which IIRC I made by sorting the temperaments in Graham's catalog by 5-limit complexity and keeping everything with complexity under 10 (or thereabouts). -Carl ____________________________________________________________ To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe, unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the subject line "info tuning-math". Or visit the website: < //www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .