Re: geometric complexity
- From: Gene W Smith <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxx>
- To: tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:38:10 -0700
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:17:09 -0400 "Paul H. Erlich"
<PErlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> How am i to take this other that some kind of imperious declaration?
Why would you take it that way? Using Euclidean distances allows me to
define what I called "geometric complexity". I don't know how to do it
otherewise, and don't see a need to attempt it. What have you go against
Euclid, anyway? :)
____________________________________________________________
To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe,
unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the subject line "info tuning-math". Or visit the
website: < //www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .
Other related posts:
