Re: geometric complexity

  • From: Gene W Smith <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:08:43 -0700



On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:11:54 -0400 "Paul H. Erlich"
<PErlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Someone give me one good reason why the lattice geometry should be
> Euclidean.

If I'm using it for geometric complexity, it should be.
____________________________________________________________

To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe,
unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the subject line "info tuning-math".  Or visit the
website:  < //www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .



Other related posts: