[THIN] Re: Server spec's
- From: Matt Kosht <matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:14:23 -0400
OK Carl I'll bite. What is wrong with XA5/2008? I run this now in
production. I find it to be stable and performing well.
-Matt
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:03 AM, <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I personally think that XenApp 5 on Server 2008 is the ugly red-headed
> step-child of the XenApp family tree. My apologies to all you good
> looking red-headed step-children on the list.
>
>
> Webster
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Server spec's
> > To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Bit of a result here
> >
> > Looks like I can go 2008 on my new servers with XenApp 5 it will apps +
> > Office 2010.
> >
> > Office 2010 being the reason for the new toys.
> >
> > Any big issues to look out for missing OS's in the same XenApp farm?
>
>
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
>
Other related posts:
