[THIN] Re: Server spec's
- From: "Webster" <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:18:07 -0500
Others may have a different experience but, in modern servers, I have never
seen a XenApp server starved for processor. But I do like having the biggest,
baddest @$$ servers my customer's money can buy! :)
I would _guess_ that a future version of XenApp _may_ use less processor
because of _potential_ changes to the core of the product. But that is just a
WAG on my part. :)
Webster
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Server spec's
>
> You think it’s a bad idea ?
>
> Also trying to spec the servers
>
> HP DL 360 G6 or G7
>
> G6 supports 4 quad core processors and G7 supports 2 quad or 6 cores
>
> Would the G7 with two 6 core processors be fine with 12 GB of ram going
> forward.
>
> Or should I spec 4 by 4 cores on a G6 with 12 GB ? as these would match the
> two most powerful servers we have in the farm?
>
> As I say need to future proof for upgrades to XenApp 6 on 2008 next year
> some time.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Server spec's
>
> I personally think that XenApp 5 on Server 2008 is the ugly red-headed step-
> child of the XenApp family tree. My apologies to all you good looking red-
> headed step-children on the list.
>
>
> Webster
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Server spec's
> > To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Bit of a result here
> >
> > Looks like I can go 2008 on my new servers with XenApp 5 it will apps
> > + Office 2010.
> >
> > Office 2010 being the reason for the new toys.
> >
> > Any big issues to look out for missing OS's in the same XenApp farm?
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
