[THIN] Re: Server spec's

  • From: Magnus Hjorleifsson <magnus@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:28:22 -0400

Win2k3 enterprise x64 if your apps will work on 64 bit 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2011, at 7:36, "Hamilton, Ronnie" <ronnie.hamilton@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> OK one more …
> 
>  
> 
> ….Is it worth looking into Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition to allow it 
> to user more than 4Gb
> 
>  
> 
> I know the best solution is to probably virtualise until I get to play with 
> XenApp 6 on 2008 R2 but I may not be able to as yet.   
> 
>  
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Magnus Hjorleifsson
> Sent: 03 June 2011 04:19
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Server spec's
> 
>  
> 
> Ima instability XML instability and according to some in CCS scalability 
> stinks and do jot recommend it for any infrastructure server
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> 
> On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:17, "Hamilton, Ronnie" <ronnie.hamilton@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Good to here that as it looks like my next two servers is going to be 2008 
> with office 2010 and XenApp5.
> 
>  
> 
> Have you mixed 2003 and 2008 in the same farm ?
> 
>  
> 
> I will be using two separate published desktops one for Office 2010 users and 
> the other for the rest.
> 
>  
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Matt Kosht
> Sent: 02 June 2011 14:14
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Server spec's
> 
>  
> 
> OK Carl I'll bite. What is wrong with XA5/2008?  I run this now in 
> production.  I find it to be stable and performing well.
> 
> -Matt
> 
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:03 AM, <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I personally think that XenApp 5 on Server 2008 is the ugly red-headed
> step-child of the XenApp family tree.  My apologies to all you good
> looking red-headed step-children on the list.
> 
> 
> Webster
> 
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Server spec's
> 
> > To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Bit of a result here
> >
> > Looks like I can go 2008 on my new servers with XenApp 5 it will apps +
> > Office 2010.
> >
> > Office 2010 being the reason for the new toys.
> >
> > Any big issues to look out for missing OS's in the same XenApp farm?
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Visit our website : www.ltai.ie
> 
> __________________________________________
> 
> Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland Limited. Registered in Ireland. Reg. No. 
> 45999. Registered Office: Naas Road, Rathcoole, Co.Dublin.
> 
> Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland Leasing Limited. Registered in Ireland. 
> Reg. No. 140891. Registered Office: Naas Road, Rathcoole, Co.Dublin.
> 
> __________________________________________
> 
> The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and may 
> be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this 
> message, delete any copies held on your systems and notify the sender by 
> return email. You should not read, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, 
> disclose or use this email or its contents in any way. Any such action is 
> strictly prohibited. Thank you.
> 
>  
> 
>  

Other related posts: