[TCUG] Un-staggered crossings
- From: "Dave Hulson" <Dave.Hulson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "TCUG" <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 08:58:16 +0100
We are coming under increasing pressure to provide pedestrian routes
through junctions which appear direct to the pedestrians. Whereas
previously we would have tried to stagger separately controlled movements
to make it clear that they were separate crossings and to avoid problems
with seeing the wrong ped signals, we are now being asked to line them up
as for a straight across crossing.
I appreciate that by using nearside pedestrian signals the problems
associated with seeing the wrong ped head can be removed, all be it with
a risk of seeing no ped head. However, is it reasonable to assume that
it will be clear to users that the individual crossings should be treated
separately?
I would welcome any views or experiences that others may have had with
regards to using 'un-staggered' crossings.
________________________________________________________________________
Unless otherwise expressly stated, nothing in this e-mail shall, as between the
City Council and the recipient and/or any other party, be deemed to constitute
any contract or order or create any kind of contractual relationship.
__________________________________________________________________________________
THE FOLLOWING WARNING IS GIVEN IS RESPECT OF ANY ATTACHMENTS
1. Whilst Nottingham City Council takes steps to prevent computer viruses
from being transmitted via electronic mail attachments, it does not give any
guarantee that attachments do not contain such viruses. You are strongly
advised to undertake anti-virus checks prior to accessing any attachments to
this electronic mail.
2. Nottingham City Council shall not be responsible for any detrimental
reliance you place on any attachments and makes no representations or
warranties of any kind with respect to any attachments or their contents and
disclaims all such representations and warranties. In addition, Nottingham
City Council makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy,
completeness or suitability for any purposes of any attachments. Any
attachments may contain technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. All
liability of Nottingham City Council howsoever arising for any such
inaccuracies or errors is expressly excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
3. Neither Nottingham City Council, nor any of its staff will be liable
for damages arising out of or in connection with the use of any attachments.
This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of
any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or
consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to
property and claims of third parties.
4. All brand names, product names and titles and copyrights used in any
attachments, are the trade marks or trade names or copyrights of their
respective holders. No permission is given by Nottingham City Council in
respect of the use of any such brand names, product names or titles or
copyrights and such use may constitute an infringement of the holder's rights.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses
********************************************************************************************************************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
