Dave Have you sought the views of your Safety Auditors? How large would the central refuge be? You could potentially have quite a few people waiting in the middle. It would surely need to be at least 3 metres wide. The use of nearside aspects would reduce the see-through problem. But people may still be confused by what others waiting in the middle are doing - when some have a green man and others have a red man. Who is applying the pressure? We have a very vocal Pedestrians Association who are against the use of staggered crossings and guard railing. We always try and quote the relevant sections of Local transport Note 2/95 to counter their arguments. I'm sure they would love this idea - please don't tell them about it, as I think we would say "No"! Regards Shirley Reynolds Warwickshire County Council "Dave Hulson" <Dave.Hulson@nottinghamci To: "TCUG" <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ty.gov.uk> cc: Sent by: Subject: [TCUG] Un-staggered crossings tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 05/07/02 08:58 Please respond to tcug We are coming under increasing pressure to provide pedestrian routes through junctions which appear direct to the pedestrians. Whereas previously we would have tried to stagger separately controlled movements to make it clear that they were separate crossings and to avoid problems with seeing the wrong ped signals, we are now being asked to line them up as for a straight across crossing. I appreciate that by using nearside pedestrian signals the problems associated with seeing the wrong ped head can be removed, all be it with a risk of seeing no ped head. However, is it reasonable to assume that it will be clear to users that the individual crossings should be treated separately? I would welcome any views or experiences that others may have had with regards to using 'un-staggered' crossings. ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug