[TCUG] Re: Signal Installation
- From: "trgardner" <trgardner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:07:14 -0700
How about removing recalcitrant contractors from your list of approved
contractors. Loss of business usually sharpens attitudes.
Terry Gardner.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dick Andrews" <RAndrews@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'tcug mail'" <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:19 AM
Subject: [TCUG] Signal Installation
>
> In this part of the world 3 of the manufacturers now subcontract
> installation work and this has resulted in a significant deterioration in
> service. At commissioning a number of "non-fatal" faults and incomplete
work
> is invariably found and it is virtually impossible to get completion as
> manufacturer and installer blame each other. (Eg an unfixed manual panel).
I
> would like to introduce a non-performance rebate, but doubt its legality
as
> the community has the use of the signals. I do of course withhold payment,
> but that gives me a problem with year end expenditure. Has anybody got a
> successful way of getting signal companies (particularly Peek) to toe the
> line?
>
> Dick
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
> the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
