A number of years ago we suffered from the same problem, but wrote a maintenance spec that would enable others to provide first line maintainenance (which included getting trained from the incumbant and ensuring that 2nd line maintenance was only carried out by the original supplier of the equipment). There was some resistance from the Police to this, as they were concerned about yet more people having keys to camera housings and any potential impact to home office approvals/calibration certificates etc. All staff had to be Police checked before keys would be issued. Under competitive tender, a 3rd party firm won the contract. The upside was, as you state - it reduced the contract costs and opened up the competition The downside was, in the first year, the contract needed a lot of our time overseeing it and it took a while for the contractor to get up to speed. Whether over the length of the contract the contract costs and local authority staff time was more economical than staying with the monopoly, I never calculated. I am no longer at that local authority so do not know what the current situation is. For info it was Siemens that won the contract. Dave Parkyns -----Original Message----- From: tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Grahame Bath Sent: 26 October 2004 09:00 To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [TCUG] Safety Camera Maintenance Good morning all Please can anyone provide details of the contractors they use to maintain their safety cameras? We appear to be suffering from a monopoly situation at present which certainly does not help our finances and introducing competition is definitely the way to go. I don't need contractual arrangements, just names and addresses if possible. Many thanks Regards Grahame Bath ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Grahame Bath Senior Engineer, Traffic Systems Surrey County Council 020 8541 7346 (Tel) 020 8541 7366 (Fax) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This email and any attachments with it are intended for the addressee only. It may be confidential and may be the subject of legal and/or professional privilege. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender or postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The content may be personal or contain personal opinions and cannot be taken as an expression of the County Council's position. Surrey County Council reserves the right to monitor all incoming and outgoing mail. Whilst every care has been taken to check this outgoing e-mail for viruses, it is your responsibility to carry out any checks upon receipt. Visit the Surrey County Council website - http://www.surreycc.gov.uk * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug