[TCUG] Re: Diagonal pedestrian crossings at junctions.
- From: mervyn.hallworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:50:48 +0100
I agree with Bruce - try to design ped facilities 'in parallel', try not to
go further down the 'inefficient design' road. You would clearly require at
least 1.4x the overall time currently given to peds on conventional
crossings (to allow for the diagonal - more once the corner radii are
accounted for) - which will potentially create more congestion and/or
require the cycle time to be increased.Such designs could potentially
assist authorities in failing two 'LTP2' indicators in future years (one on
congestion & one on high ped delay?)!
Mervyn
0113 2476750
________________________________________________________________________
The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the
intended recipient only. If you know you are not the intended recipient,
please do not use or disclose the information in any way and please
delete this email (and any attachment) from your system.
Service of legal documents is not accepted by email
________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
