You have to remember the ELI test merely evaluates the circuits performance to provide fault current large enough to disconnect the fuse protecting the said circuit. The test normally looked for is the resistance value of the circuit (Zs) and to see that it is lower than that of the value for the protecting fuse. The fuses normally found on phase drive cards are not in the regs and so if you consider these are the ones protecting the cables out to the signal poles then you need to work out a value for them. I did submit these a while back. Never the less the eli test will indicate if the SWA still has sound connections and therefore eliminates the need for disconnecting any circuits. This is deemed ok as we avoid disruption to traffic control and the ensuing dangers. The circuit is then assumed to be safe 'n' sound and any subsequent faults such as a live wire touching any metalwork will be safely disconnected by the fuse blowing - this is the principle of protection form the IEE regs - EEBADs. One last thing for those who may remember my presentation on electrical design. Remember the short movie with a fuse exploding? I evaluated the performance of the phase drive fuse, and found that the glass version, so often supplied with controller, to be unsuitable for disconnection of large fault currents in the order of 1000 or 2000amps when used in conjunction with a 20 or 30amp signal fuse. The answer if to ensure you have the ceramic version installed not the glass type. Keith Brunt -----Original Message----- From: Bill Emett [mailto:bill.emett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 15 June 2004 14:44 To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [TCUG] Re: 6 year electrical testing Why would you need to disconnect all cores at pole top, surely only one core would be necessary to form a circuit to test and an ELI test will also prove armoring. Most courses on this subject relate to house wiring which suggests you only have to test 20% of the system this should reduce the down time if applied to signals. Unless this 20% shows a problem then the whole system has to be checked. One of the queries I have is with E.L.I testing at poles is as follows, Our contractors tell me they use a spare live feed but this would only test straight from the origin via whatever fuse they use to the pole back via the armored cable and the usual Manweb path to the substation this is bound to give a favourable result. This can't give the practical reading via the phase drive circuits which are essentially in series and have there own resistance which must be included in the E.L.I figure. A figure quoted for a max E.L.I test for a particular controller is 5 ohms which is down to the 10A fuse on the phase drive card, not the main 20 or 30 amp fuse in the supply which this figure would fail. >>> chris.gladwyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 15-Jun-04 1:33:39 pm >>> I am currently looking at TCUG guidance Note 1 which in section 2.4.7 suggests that core to core testing may be omitted as there is a possibility of :- 1. Reduced safety for highway users whilst installation inoperative for lengthy periods (perhaps up to 3 days at complex sites). 2. Insecure reconnection of cables especially on older installations. 3. Incorrect retermination of cables at either street equipment or controller. 4. Additional traffic congestion while temporary arrangements in operation. 5. Loss of special facilities (pedestrians, cycles, bus priority) for long periods Whilst I agree with this the document then recommends that the continuity of the steel wire armour be tested. The test procedure for this is to disconnect every core at the pole cap and then connect all cores together and connect to the SWA. Surely some of the arguments for core to core testing apply to this as well. Does anyone have advice on this and is there an alternative test that could be carried out that would meet the requirements of BS7671 without having to disconnect all connections in the pole cap. Chris Gladwyn Hertfordshire Highways The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended to be solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain copyright and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee) please e-mail us at Postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and delete the message from your computer; copying, distribution, use or disclosure of its contents is strictly prohibited. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption no responsibility is accepted for changes made to this message after it was sent. For this reason it may be inappropriate to rely on advice contained in any e-mail without obtaining written confirmation of it. In addition, no liability or responsibility is accepted for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Please note that for business purposes, outgoing and incoming emails from and to the company may be monitored and recorded. Mouchel Parkman UK Ltd, Registered in England at West Hall, Parvis Road, West Byfleet, Surrey UK KT14 6EZ Registered No : 1686040 ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug ************************************************************************* The contents of the e-mail and any transmitted files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Transport for London Street Management hereby excludes any warranty and any liability as to the quality or accuracy of the contents of this e-mail and any attached transmitted files. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ************************************************************************* ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug