[stamp] Re: Should we combine with FSN?
- From: Erik Thulin <ethulin@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:42:18 -0700
So, if we were to combine with FSN:
There would be more developers
The app would do more things then just match data and analysis
We (as in the developers currently associated with STAMP) would have less
control over the project
There would be less of a focus on stats development so it would be weaker.
If what you want is stats analysis you would have to do develop other stuff
as well.
As of a few days ago there is another option!
I have been talking with SOAP and they seem to offer a much better deal.
They want to do a much more partnership like thing, i.e. SOAP developers
come over and work on STAMP with us and me turn out one amazing app that has
data that can be exported to the SOAP database. SOAP is really trying this
year to create a great scouting network and they already have the name
recognition. They would also have on their site "use STAMP for your match
data input yada yada yada". Personally that is what I think is the best idea
because it will let us have a great app aswell as a scouting program that
can do many things (the other portion of stamp).
- Erik
On 10/10/05, Bryan Kitchener <bryan.kitchener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yep, looks like its working now. I got the very first email and this one,
> but not the ones in between. What would be the pros and cons of combining
> with them? (Putting in my 'two cents worth' even though I'm a lowly
> developer from another team)
> -Bryan
>
> On 10/10/05, Ryan McElroy <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Worked for me.
> >
> > What is FSN, besides the obvious moniker of FIRST Scouting Network?
> >
> > ~Ryan
> >
> > Erik Thulin wrote:
> >
> > I am attempting to forward this message to the stamp mailing list, if it
> > goes through try sending another message typed after this date.
> >
> > - Erik
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Brandon Ripley <Brandon.Ripley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Oct 10, 2005 8:10 AM
> > Subject: FW: Returned mail: see transcript for details
> > To: "ethulin@xxxxxxxxx" < ethulin@xxxxxxxxx >
> >
> > Erik,
> > I'm getting messages bounced back from the
> > freelists.org<//freelists.org>list. Any
> > suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brandon
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto: MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 10:03 AM
> > To: Brandon.Ripley@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
> >
> >
> > The original message was received at Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:30:54 -0500
> > (CDT)
> > from neen-mail-002.na.plexus.com <http://neen-mail-002.na.plexus.com> [
> > 206.209.254.25 <http://206.209.254.25> ]
> >
> > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> > <stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > (reason: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname,
> > [ 64.215.193.226 <http://64.215.193.226>])
> >
> > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> > ... while talking to turing.freelists.org <//turing.freelists.org>
> > .:
> > >>> DATA
> > <<< 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [
> > 64.215.193.226 <http://64.215.193.226>]
> > <stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>... Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find
> > your hostname, [ 64.215.193.226 <http://64.215.193.226>] <<< 554 Error:
> > no valid recipients Message
> > could not be delivered for 5 days Message will be deleted from queue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Brandon Ripley < Brandon.Ripley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "'stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:30:49 -0500
> > Subject: RE: [stamp] Should we combine with FSN?
> > I would expect there are enough similarities between the two projects
> > that
> > we would both benefit from combining forces. Is there a specification
> > document for the FSN yet? Has that been around for a while or is that
> > project also very green? Do we have enough people on board at this point
> > to
> > start outlining the specific requirements for STAMP and architecting the
> >
> > database and data collection methods?
> >
> > I plan on reading through a PHP book in the next week to learn the
> > language
> > and then I am going to disseminate that to the other team members. I
> > should
> > have 2-3 students allocated to work on this project and the sooner we
> > can
> > start, the better.
> >
> > Brandon
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erik Thulin [mailto:ethulin@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 8:57 AM
> > To: stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [stamp] Should we combine with FSN?
> >
> >
> > I was approached by leaders of FSN (FIRST Scouting Network) asking me to
> > combine STAMP with their project. FSN would be less pointed towards
> > statistical analysis and more towards general scouting. They are also
> > more
> > about sharing the scouting data for all teams to see. So, do you want to
> > combine STAMP and FSN or keep working on STAMP?
> >
> > - Erik
> >
> > --
> > Unless otherwise noted the content of this message is licensed under a:
> > Creative Commons Attribution, Share Alike License. CreativeCommons.org
> > Blog: http://blog.freedomdown.net/ <http://blog.freedomdown.net/>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unless otherwise noted the content of this message is licensed under a:
> > Creative Commons Attribution, Share Alike License. CreativeCommons.org
> > Blog: http://blog.freedomdown.net/
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -Bryan Kitchener
--
Unless otherwise noted the content of this message is licensed under a:
Creative Commons Attribution, Share Alike License. CreativeCommons.org
Blog: http://blog.freedomdown.net/
Other related posts:
