[stamp] Re: Should we combine with FSN?

  • From: Bryan Kitchener <bryan.kitchener@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:46:28 -0400

Yep, looks like its working now. I got the very first email and this one,
but not the ones in between. What would be the pros and cons of combining
with them? (Putting in my 'two cents worth' even though I'm a lowly
developer from another team)
-Bryan

On 10/10/05, Ryan McElroy <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Worked for me.
>
> What is FSN, besides the obvious moniker of FIRST Scouting Network?
>
> ~Ryan
>
> Erik Thulin wrote:
>
> I am attempting to forward this message to the stamp mailing list, if it
> goes through try sending another message typed after this date.
>
> - Erik
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Brandon Ripley <Brandon.Ripley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Oct 10, 2005 8:10 AM
> Subject: FW: Returned mail: see transcript for details
> To: "ethulin@xxxxxxxxx" <ethulin@xxxxxxxxx >
>
> Erik,
> I'm getting messages bounced back from the 
> freelists.org<//freelists.org>list. Any
> suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto: MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 10:03 AM
> To: Brandon.Ripley@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
>
>
> The original message was received at Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:30:54 -0500 (CDT)
> from neen-mail-002.na.plexus.com <http://neen-mail-002.na.plexus.com> [
> 206.209.254.25 <http://206.209.254.25> ]
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> (reason: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname,
> [ 64.215.193.226 <http://64.215.193.226>])
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ... while talking to turing.freelists.org <//turing.freelists.org>.:
> >>> DATA
> <<< 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [ 
> 64.215.193.226<http://64.215.193.226>
> ]
> <stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>... Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find
> your hostname, [ 64.215.193.226 <http://64.215.193.226>] <<< 554 Error: no
> valid recipients Message
> could not be delivered for 5 days Message will be deleted from queue
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Brandon Ripley < Brandon.Ripley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:30:49 -0500
> Subject: RE: [stamp] Should we combine with FSN?
> I would expect there are enough similarities between the two projects that
> we would both benefit from combining forces. Is there a specification
> document for the FSN yet? Has that been around for a while or is that
> project also very green? Do we have enough people on board at this point
> to
> start outlining the specific requirements for STAMP and architecting the
> database and data collection methods?
>
> I plan on reading through a PHP book in the next week to learn the
> language
> and then I am going to disseminate that to the other team members. I
> should
> have 2-3 students allocated to work on this project and the sooner we can
> start, the better.
>
> Brandon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Thulin [mailto:ethulin@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 8:57 AM
> To: stamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [stamp] Should we combine with FSN?
>
>
> I was approached by leaders of FSN (FIRST Scouting Network) asking me to
> combine STAMP with their project. FSN would be less pointed towards
> statistical analysis and more towards general scouting. They are also more
> about sharing the scouting data for all teams to see. So, do you want to
> combine STAMP and FSN or keep working on STAMP?
>
> - Erik
>
> --
> Unless otherwise noted the content of this message is licensed under a:
> Creative Commons Attribution, Share Alike License. CreativeCommons.org
> Blog: http://blog.freedomdown.net/ <http://blog.freedomdown.net/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Unless otherwise noted the content of this message is licensed under a:
> Creative Commons Attribution, Share Alike License. CreativeCommons.org
> Blog: http://blog.freedomdown.net/
>
>


--
-Bryan Kitchener

Other related posts: