[sparkscoffee] Re: Fwd: Do you know what today is?

  • From: R George <xgeorge@xxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:54:55 -0700

DR/RR,

FYI: When I use the word Constitution I include the Bill of Rights because the 1st 10 were ratified the year following full
ratification of the Constitution.  1790/1791.

*Amendment I**
**Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;**
*
Below is from the guy who had a little something to do with the Constitution - *Thomas Jefferson.*

“… I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature
should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof,’ *thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.”* ~~ Letter to the Danbury Baptists, January 1, 1802

“[E]very one must act according to the dictates of his own reason, and mine tells me that civil powers alone have been given to the
President of the U.S. *and no authority to direct the religious exercises of his constituents.*” ~~ Letter to Rev. Samuel Miller, January 23, 1808

“History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. *This marks the lowest grade of **
**ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.”* ~~ letter to Alexander von Humboldt, December 6, 1813

And an excerpt from a favorite founding father of mine - *Thomas Paine (Age of Reason)**
*
*"I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, **
**nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.**
**
**All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, **
**and monopolize power and profit.**
**
**I do not mean by this declaration to condemn those who believe otherwise; they have the same right to their belief as I have to mine. But it is necessary to **
**the happiness of man, that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.**
*
It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted
the chastity of his mind, as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe, he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime.
*He takes up the trade of a priest for the sake of gain, and in order to qualify himself for that trade, he begins with a perjury. Can we conceive any thing more destructive to morality than this?*

Soon after I had published the pamphlet Common Sense, in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed
by a revolution in the system of religion. The adulterous connection of church and state, wherever it had taken place, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, had so
effectually prohibited by pains and penalties, every discussion upon established creeds, and upon first principles of religion, that until the system of government should
be changed, those subjects could not be brought fairly and openly before the world; but that whenever this should be done, a revolution in the system of religion would
follow. Human inventions and priestcraft would be detected; and man would return to the pure, unmixed and unadulterated belief of one God, and no more.

Every national church or religion has established itself by pretending some special mission from God, communicated to certain individuals. The Jews have their Moses; the Christians their
Jesus Christ, their apostles and saints; and the Turks their Mahomet, as if the way to God was not open to every man alike.

Each of those churches show certain books, which they call revelation, or the word of God. The Jews say, that their word of God was given by God to Moses, face to face; the Christians say,
that their word of God came by divine inspiration: and the Turks say, that their word of God (the Koran) was brought by an angel from Heaven. Each of those churches accuse the other
of unbelief; *and for my own part, I disbelieve them all.**
*
As it is necessary to affix right ideas to words, I will, before I proceed further into the subject, offer some other observations on the word revelation. Revelation, when applied to religion,
means something communicated immediately from God to man."

Continued here:
http://www.ushistory.org/paine/reason/reason1.htm

RG



On 9/16/2016 5:14 PM, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. wrote:

RR,

You're absolutely right on that one, Ron.

73
DR

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Actually the separation of church and state is not in the
    Constitution. This is an interpretation by the Supreme Court. A
    future Supreme Court could make a different interpretation.

    The fact is that the Constitution and Bill of Rights were written
    by Christians and are based on Christian ideals. This is why it is
    not like Sharia Law or the Talmud.

    People who want to change it to make it more like their culture
    and their religion claim that it was designed so that it could
    change with changing conditions but this is bullshit. That would
    be like changing the Ten Commandments.

    -RR, Sick of political correctness that I never agreed to and sick
    of all the bullshit..


Other related posts: