Thanks for the many helpful replies. I got exactly the information I was = searching for.=20 Basically I got confirmation of my belief that the value of mixed mode S = parameters is mainly in interpretation of the characteristics of the = differential device that they represent. But I also learned that there = may be more value than I thought in using a mixed mode model. I note = some specifics below. Jim Nadolny and Bill Beale made me realize another application of mixed = mode S parameters. When we only know the response of the n-port to = differential stimulus, and thus don't have enough information to convert = back to standard s parameters to get a complete model, we can still = model just the differential response using a mixed mode S parameter = model - basically we have reduced the 4 port to a 2 port model.=20 This seems to have practical implications beyond that of turning a 4 = port into a 2 port device. In fact it seems that, if a true mixed mode = VNA were available and could apply true differential stimulus, then the = response to a differential stimulus could be measured without connecting = the gnd of the VNA to the GND of the DUT (which may not be accessible). = I suppose the same could be done in the time domain using a TDR/TDT and = those instruments do seem to be available with true differential drive. = What do you think? Gary Otonari made me realize about the challenges of de-embedding a 4 = port device versus a 2 port when we are only interested in differntial = response. I agree with Brad Cole that mixed mode S parameters are not restricted = to lossless devices. Like the standard S parameters they depend on the = linearity of the n-port that they represent. Thanks again to all who replied. Looks like I asked the right group. Vince > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig Clewell [mailto:cclewell@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 6:12 AM > To: vince_cavanna@xxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] why do I need mixed mode S parameters? >=20 >=20 > Vince,=20 >=20 > I've embedded my responses to your questions below >=20 > . > Q. What I am trying to understand is why I would ever want to=20 > use mixed > =3D > mode S parameters in a time-domain or frequency domain=20 > simulation, and =3D > how to use them. =20 >=20 > A. As I believe Bill alluded to the mixed mode S parameters will allow > you to see if there is any asymmetry in the coupling. If=20 > there is than > you will have a larger cross mode coupling in one direction vs. the > other direction, meaning that you're differential to common=20 > mode will be > different in both directions. You may want to know this=20 > information for > a read/write line, or any other bi-directional line. This information > may be useful when you look at the affects of even and odd mode > switching on your system. >=20 >=20 > Q. I am also interested to learn what simulators support =3D > mixed mode S parameters directly, as using them in a=20 > simulator such as =3D > Hspice seems cumbersome. My approach today is to simply use=20 > standard S =3D > parameters directly. >=20 > A. As my friend and ex-compatriot Jim Nadolny pointed out you may only > have a model of the differential response. I am not aware of any > simulator that will allow you to import the mixed mode S parameters > directly other than HFSS? I always use the natural S parameters and > then post process if I need to see the other terms as you have pointed > out in your e-mail. >=20 > Regards,=20 >=20 > Craig >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu