Hello Arpad, thanks for the feedback. In this case I guess I have missunderstood the part below your quote from the spec: C_comp is considered an independent variable. This is because C_comp | includes bonding pad capacitance, which does not necessarily track | fabrication process variations. The conservative approach to using IBIS | data will associate large C_comp values with slow, weak models, and the | small C_comp values with fast, strong models. | So I interpreted this as: Put the large C_comp value into the min Column (and I also interpreted Toms and Steves feedback this way), but according your statement the lowes C_comp should be in the min column and the EDA tool need to select the max value when I simulate with slow settings. But re-reading Steves response he just mentioned I should use the largest C_Comp for worst case slow corner simulation, but he did not mention how I should do this. I might need do select the setting of C_comp manually if simulate slow corner and the IBIS file has the lowest C_Comp value in the min column ... But this then opens again my original questions: Does it make sense to put the large C_com value in the min Columen ? (or the highest Temp in the Min column) As I have seen IBIS files with different methodologies on the arrangement of C_Comp I don't really think that my EDA tool will decide correctly which C_comp to select ... Thanks and regards Hermann EKH - EyeKnowHow Hermann Ruckerbauer www.EyeKnowHow.de Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Veilchenstrasse 1 94554 Moos Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 schrieb Muranyi, Arpad: > Hermann, > > I am not sure where you got the idea from that the IBIS spec > says "one can place the largest value in the min Column in > order to have the worst slow case covered". If you look in > Section 9 of the specification, you will find the following: > > | The "min" and "max" columns for all remaining keywords and > subparameters > | will contain the smallest and largest magnitude values. This applies > to the > | [Model] subparameter C_comp as well even if the correlation to the > voltage, > | temperature, and process variations are known because information > about such > | correlation is not available in all cases. > > Thanks, > > Arpad > ============================================================== > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Hermann Ruckerbauer > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 10:29 AM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: IBIS min, typ and max. values > > Hello Sudhanshu, > that's interesting. > In this case the spec and the IBIS cookbook mention it differently ... > The cookbook mentiones to use the same order (smallest value in the min > column) and let the tool decide, while the Spec mentiones, that one can > place the largest value in the min Column in order to have the worst > slow case covered ... > > Any feedback from the tool vendors how they implemented this selection ? > > Thanks and Regards > > Hermann > > EKH - EyeKnowHow > Hermann Ruckerbauer > www.EyeKnowHow.de > Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Veilchenstrasse 1 > 94554 Moos > Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 > Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 > Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 > > > schrieb Sudhanshu SINGH: > >> Hello All, >> >> Reagrding c_comp as put previously in this mail, I have a query that, >> why c_comp values extracted in typ, min or max conditions are not put >> respectively in same typ, min or max columns in IBIS. >> >> >> As Section 5.1.3.1 of cookbook ver4 says: >> >> Note that when constructing the IBIS file the numerically largest >> > value of > >> C_comp is listed as the "max" value while the numerically smallest >> > value of > >> C_comp is listed as the "min" value. C_comp min and max values do not >> necessarily correlate with the min and max conditions under which the >> > I-V > >> and switching data was gathered. The actual association of C_comp >> > corner > >> values with simulation corners is performed at the tool level. >> >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Sudhanshu >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > >> Behalf Of Hermann Ruckerbauer >> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 2:23 PM >> To: Lynne D. Green >> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: IBIS min, typ and max. values >> >> Thanks to all who replied (that fast). >> I just love the List and everybody sharing his knowhnow there !!!! >> >> BTW: Happy Birthday!!!! >> >> Hermann >> >> EKH - EyeKnowHow >> Hermann Ruckerbauer >> www.EyeKnowHow.de >> Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Veilchenstrasse 1 >> 94554 Moos >> Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 >> Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 >> Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 >> >> >> schrieb Lynne D. Green: >> >> >>> Hello, Hermann, >>> >>> Note that the "SPICE" temperature is JUNCTION temperature, not >>> ambient. IBIS [Temperature] is also junction temperature. The >>> > junction > >>> is hotter than ambient. >>> >>> Since the TYP temperature is only 25C, it is likely that ambient was >>> used instead of junction when creating the model. Generally, >>> increasing TYP and HOT temperatures by 25C is used to account for >>> > self > >>> heating when simulating to create I/O models for IBIS. COLD >>> temperature is not adjusted. >>> >>> Note the Max [Temperature] is higher in bipolar I/O and lower in CMOS >>> I/O. >>> >>> Hope this helps. >>> >>> Lynne Green >>> Chair, IBIS Model Committee >>> >>> >>> >>> Hermann Ruckerbauer wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hello *, >>>> >>>> I hope somebody can help me with interpreting some things in an IBIS >>>> file >>>> I'm just working with an IBIS file where the min, typ, max values >>>> > are > >>>> arranged in the following way: >>>> >>>> typ >>>> min max >>>> >>>> C_comp 0.284pF 0.409pF >>>> 0.264pF >>>> [Voltage Range] 1.200V 1.100V >>>> 1.300V >>>> [Temperature Range] 25 125 >>>> > 125 > >>>> The C_comp min is the largest value and the Temperature is in there >>>> twice with 125C. >>>> The same order is used for RAC and CAC for a terminator (largest >>>> > value > >>>> in the min column) >>>> >>>> >>>> e. g. in a Micron IBIS file is even some comment on having 0C as >>>> > max. > >>>> temperature : >>>> >>>> | Junction Temperature (Ambient temp is 25C typ, 85C min, 0C max) >>>> | typ >>>> min max >>>> [Temperature Range] 40.0 100.0 >>>> > 0.0 > >>>> Regarding C_comp the Micron model lists it in the different order: >>>> | typ >>>> min >>>> max >>>> C_comp 2.466pF 2.316pF >>>> 2.616pF >>>> >>>> In the IBIS spec I found the comment that C_comp is independent of >>>> fabrication process and therefore to generate worst case it can make >>>> sense to use the largest C_comp for slow process ==> in the min >>>> > column. > >>>> Basically this makes sense to me, but does it then make sense to use >>>> > the > >>>> smalles C_comp value in the min column ? >>>> >>>> So my questions would be: >>>> Is there any common usage of the min column regarding parameters >>>> > like > >>>> C_Comp, RAC, CAC (and maybe ohters) ? >>>> Usually I would expect low temperature for fast devices, so having >>>> > 0C in > >>>> the max column make sense, but does it make sense to have 125C in >>>> > min > >>>> and max column ? >>>> >>>> Any feedback is highly appreciated! >>>> >>>> Thanks and regards >>>> >>>> Hermann >>>> >>>> EKH - EyeKnowHow >>>> Hermann Ruckerbauer >>>> www.EyeKnowHow.de >>>> Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Veilchenstrasse 1 >>>> 94554 Moos >>>> Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 >>>> Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 >>>> Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject >>>> > field > >>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>>> >>>> For help: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>>> >>>> >>>> List technical documents are available at: >>>> http://www.si-list.net >>>> >>>> List archives are viewable at: >>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>>> >>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2895 - Release Date: >>> > 05/25/10 > >>> >>> >> 08:26:00 >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.net >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.net >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2896 - Release Date: >> > 05/25/10 20:26:00 > >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date: 05/26/10 > 08:25:00 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu