Matt, I haven't tested any X5R capacitors, so I can't comment on them at this time. If you can get me some samples I'd be happy to check them on the HP 4195A Network/Spectrum Analyzer, and report back here. Thanks! John Barnes dBi Corporation 216 Hillsboro Ave Lexington, KY 40511-2105 http://www.dbicorporation.com/ ruston, matt wrote: > > Istvan, John: > > Hi. Any thoughts on using X5R caps instead of X7R. I believe these caps are > becoming more popular, give almost an order of magnitude more capacitance > per body size (in 0402 sizes), and have similar dissapation factors and > aging rates as an X7R cap. > > The X5R cap has a better temperature range (-55C to 85C) and tolerance than > Y5V and Z5U. The cap can be used above 85C with some degradation in > tolerance, but since they pack more capacitance in the same package and > decoupling isn't all that sensitive to a few more percent of lower > capacitance, X5R seem like a win over X7R (assuming you subscribe to the > decoupling methodology described by John below; higher capacitance is > better). I could see running X5R up to at least 100C with no major problems. > > X5R does have a have a cost penalty. My limited pricing experience shows > X5R may be 50% -100% more costly. Does anyone have any better information on > this? > > Any other thoughts on X5R (good or bad)? > > Regards, > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Istvan Novak [mailto:istvan.novak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 7:25 AM > To: jrbarnes@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Antwort: Re: Placement of Decoupling Caps > > John, > > I agree with all three of your statements/conclusions below. > > Thanks for posting the Appendix of your design guide. A > couple of comments: > - as you mentioned, ESR tends to be a function of several things, > therefore the quoted ESR value of around 100 milliohms for > capacitors with X7R and Z5Y dielectrics is true today only for the > smaller-valued capacitors. In the uF range, some X7R capacitors > have less than 10 milliohms ESR. > - I would not limit the useful frequency range of Z5U and Y5U capacitors > just because their dissipation factor increases with frequency. In fact, > the > ideal bypass capacitor would have zero current leakage at DC and arbitrarily > high conduction (loss tangent) at any AC frequencies: this would in fact > help > bypassing. But as you say, the huge variation of capacitance over > temperature > and voltage (plus aging) make them an inferior choice anyway. > > Regards > > Istvan Novak > SUN Microsystems > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Barnes" <jrbarnes@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <istvan.novak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 10:50 AM > Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Re: Antwort: Re: Placement of Decoupling Caps > > > Istvan, > > I was developing Design Guidelines on Power Distribution for my previous > > employer back in 2000. I found conflicting advice about choosing > > bypass/decoupling capacitors in the engineering literature. So I > > measured a bunch of different types and values of capacitors on an HP > > 4195A Network/Spectrum Analyzer to try to resolve these questions for > > myself: > > > > 1. You should go for the smallest package you can. > > > > Answer: Seems to be true. ESL is usually lower in a smaller > > package with the same length:width ratio, but ESR showed no obvious > > pattern of changes. For a given length, a wider package will > > usually have a lower ESL. > > > > 2. You should go for the largest capacitance that you can get in a > > package. > > > > Answer: Seems to be true. ESL showed no obvious relation to > > capacitance, but ESR often dropped as the capacitance increased. > > > > 3. The dielectric does not affect ESR and ESL. > > > > Answer: Seems to be true until you reach/exceed the SRF. The > > impedance of C0G/NP0 capacitors then follows an inductive path, > > while X7R/Z5U/Y5U/Y5V capacitors wallow around near the ESR for a > > while then start rising slowly. This is probably good, because the > > lossy behavior will prevent sharp resonances that could cause > > unwanted peaks in the power-distribution network's impedance. > > > > I personally prefer the X7R dielectric for bypass/decoupling capacitors, > > as high as it will go. The reasonably tight tolerance over temperature/ > > voltage gives me confidence that all production units will be > > reasonably close to the units we characterized and qualified during > > Design Verification Test (DVT). I use some Y5U's as "bulk" ceramic > > capacitors, usually between 1 and 4 per integrated circuit, to cover the > > frequency region between the X7R's and the aluminum electrolytic bypass > > capacitors. > > > > To help people choose an appropriate dielectric for a capacitor, here is > > an appendix from these design guidelines. > > > > John Barnes KS4GL > > dBi Corporation > > http://www.dbicorporation.com/ > > > > > > > > APPENDIX E: CAPACITOR DIELECTRICS > > > > Ceramic capacitors are commonly available in four dielectrics: > > * C0G or NP0 (titanium oxide, neodymium oxide): > > - Dielectric constant K of 85-170 > > - Best stability > > - -55 to 125C operating range > > - 0 to +/-30ppm/C variation over temperature > > - 0 to +/-30ppm/C variation over temperature and 0 to rated voltage > > - Dissipation factor (DF = ESR / Xc) under 0.001 at 25C > > - Aging rate 0%/decade > > - Capacitance little affected by frequency > > - Has the lowest ESR, especially above 30MHz. > > - Tends to be most expensive for a given capacitance and voltage > > (CV). > > * X7R and BX (barium titanate): > > - K of 600-4000 > > - Poorer stability than C0G > > - -55 to 125C operating range > > - +/-15% variation over temperature versus capacitance at 25C > > - BX has +15 to -25% variation over temperature and 0 to rated > > voltage > > - X7R may drop 20-45% from 0 to rated voltage > > - DF <= 0.025 over temperature, drops as temperature and DC voltage > > increase, increases as AC voltage and frequency increase. > > - Aging rate maximum -2.5% per decade, typically -0.8 to -2% per > > decade time > > - Capacitance may drop 10-18% from DC to 10MHz > > - ESR is about 100 milliohms from 10-30MHz. > > * Z5U (barium titanate): > > - K of 4000-18,000 > > - Poorer stability than X7R > > - 10 to 85C operating range > > - +22 to -56% variation over temperature versus capacitance at 25C > > - May drop 60% from 0 to rated voltage > > - DF <= 0.030 over temperature, drops as temperature and DC voltage > > increase, increases as AC voltage and frequency increase, > > increases greatly above 1 to 20MHz, so maximum usable frequency is > > about 50MHz. > > - Aging rate -3% to -5% per decade time > > - Capacitance may drop 20% from DC to 10MHz > > - ESR is about 100 milliohms at 5MHz. > > - Is piezoelectric-- can generate voltage spikes if jolted or > > vibrated. > > * Y5U and Y5V (lead perovskite): > > - Highest K > > - Poorest stability. > > - -30 to 85C operating range > > - Y5U has +22 to -56% variation over temperature versus capacitance > > at 25C > > - Y5V has +22 to -82% variation over temperature versus capacitance > > at 25C > > - May drop 60 to 80% from 0 to rated voltage > > - DF <= 0.050 over temperature, drops as temperature and DC voltage > > increase, increases as AC voltage and frequency increase, > > increases greatly above ??MHz, so maximum usable frequency is > > about ??MHz. > > - Aging rate about -5% per decade time > > - Capacitance may double or treble from DC to 2MHz > > - ESR is about 10-60 milliohms > > > > EIA RS-198 designations for temperature-stable Class 1 dielectrics: > > * First (letter) significant digits of temperature coefficient: > > - C = 0.0 > > - M = 1.0 > > - P = 1.5 > > - R = 2.2 > > - S = 3.3 > > - T = 4.7 > > - U = 7.5 > > * Second (number), multiplier of temperature coefficient: > > - 0 = -1 part per million / degree C (ppm/C) > > - 1 = -10 ppm/C > > - 2 = -100 ppm/C > > - 3 = -1000 ppm/C > > - 4 = -10,000 ppm/C > > - 5 = +1 ppm/C > > - 6 = +10 ppm/C > > - 7 = +100 ppm/C > > - 8 = +1000 ppm/C > > - 9 = +10,000 ppm/C > > * Third (letter), tolerance of temperature coefficient: > > - G = +/-30 ppm/C > > - H = +/-60 ppm/C > > - J = +/-120 ppm/C > > - K = +/-250 ppm/C > > - L = +/-500 ppm/C > > - M = +/-1000 ppm/C > > - N = +/-2500 ppm/C > > > > Examples: > > * R2G = -220 ppm/C +/-30 ppm/C = -250 to -190 ppm/C (N220) > > * S2H = -330 ppm/C +/-60 ppm/C = -390 to -270 ppm/C (N330) > > * U2H = -750 ppm/C +/-60 ppm/C = -810 to -690 ppm/C (N750) > > * M7G = +100 ppm/C +/-30 ppm/C = +70 to +130 ppm/C (P100) > > > > * C0G = NP0 = MIL-C-20D CG > > * S1G = N030 = MIL-C-20D HG > > * U1G = N080 = MIL-C-20D LG > > * P2G = N150 = MIL-C-20D PG > > * R2G = N220 = MIL-C-20D RG > > * S2H = N330 = MIL-C-20D SH > > * T2H = N470 = MIL-C-20D TH > > * U2J = N750 = MIL-C-20D UJ > > * P3K = N1500 > > * R3L = N2200 > > > > > > EIA RS-198 designations for general-purpose Class 2 dielectrics: > > * First (letter), lowest rated temperature: > > - X = -55C minimum > > - Y = -30C minimum > > - Z = +10C minimum > > * Second (number), highest rated temperature: > > - 2 = +45C maximum > > - 4 = +65C maximum > > - 5 = +85C maximum > > - 6 = +105C maximum > > - 7 = +125C maximum > > * Third (letter) tolerance: > > - A = +/-1.0% tolerance > > - B = +/-1.5% tolerance > > - C = +/-2.2% tolerance > > - D = +/-3.3% tolerance > > - E = +/-4.7% tolerance > > - F = +/-7.5% tolerance > > - P = +/-10% tolerance > > - R = +/-15% tolerance > > - S = +/-22% tolerance > > - T = +22 to -33% tolerance > > - U = +22 to -56% tolerance > > - V = +22 to -82% tolerance > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu