[sac-forum] Re: Waivers
- From: "Stars" <stars@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 10:39:22 -0700
Thad, I have asked this before. Has the board contacted our insurance
company to get their thoughts and feeling on these waiver's and where they
support the idea or not. I have seen no answer to this question. I will
not be in favor of waiver's until I here an answer to this one question, and
what their response is. I do think that Incorporation as a Tax-exempt
Corporation is a great idea.
Tom Hilton
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Thad Robosson
Sent: 09/07/2005 9:54 AM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Waivers
> Is there a speaker for the meeting next Friday? If there is one, then
> maybe having a vote on these amendments should be rescheduled for
> another meeting, a business meeting without a speaker, so that members
> can have plenty of time to discuss all the amendments if they want
> without them, or the president, feeling discussions have to be cut off
> to have time for the speaker. Having said this, more than likely there
> will not be much discussion by members, but I think having plenty of
> time set aside to discuss amendments to the Constitution, a serious
> matter, should always be preserved, just in case.
> Stan
>
Stan, our Vice President has done an exceedingly fine
job at procuring speakers. I can not see, in the near future, being
able to hold a meeting that a speaker is not already scheduled.
Having said that, while I'm certain that some parties would
attend, I think we would be hard pressed to actually hold
a business meeting (to which no speaker is present) that would
have enough attendees to make a worthwhile event.
This is not to say that I am not pondering the situation.....
Thad
Other related posts:
