Dwight,Could you explain your statement "Chinese company yes but American invested or owned"? It seems there are all kinds of nuances on how things can be interpreted. To me, if it is a Chinese company, than how can it be American owned? If it is American owned then it is an American company not a Chinese company. Let's not confuse geographic location of a factory or headquarters with ownership. Also, if I am not mixing up my companies, when I was looking into getting a refractor many years ago I had checked into Synta. Synta seemed to have good reviews, but at the time was only sold in Canada (and Europe too I think and maybe some other countries, but not the US). I would have had to finagled somehow to buy one. Now, if it is an American owned company, then why would Synta have only been sold in Canada (I think Europe also). I see now Synta is now sold in the US (Skywatcher), but I don't think that was always the case? If I remember correctly, why was Synta not sold in the US but is now? Something changed. The ad in S&T says Skywatcher-USA. This sounds suspicious. It sounds like an overseas company attempting to fool Americans into believing it is a US company.
Anyway, I did some more searching on the internet to find out more about Synta. There is little of to find that is credible and authoritative. Some of the links below say it is a Chinese company, but then it appears in a couple links that it is really a Taiwan company. Anyone else have information on this that is not heresay? One thing that is clear is that Synta had a deep involvement with Celestron before being bought, and that Synta had a deep involvement in the development of the Nexstar.
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/257422/Main/103401 http://www.hktdc.com/sourcing/manufacturers/company_home/en/1X0417ZG/Synta_Technology_Corporation.htm http://www.taiwantrade.com.tw/EP/Introduction.do?Method=showIntrIndex&company=synta http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Celestron#encyclopedia Stan dbogan3220@xxxxxxx wrote:
I was told once a while back that Syntha was actually owned by American backers. Chinese company yes but American invested or owned. Wikpedia is not a very reliable source of information, needs to be taken with a grain of salt.Dwight -----Original Message----- From: Stan Gorodenski <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sat, Sep 5, 2009 7:00 pm Subject: [sac-forum] Re: MEADE ETX-LS 6" ACF dbogan3220@xxxxxxx wrote:Meade Bashing goes back to the days of sci.astro.amatuer when people used to complain about Meade products service and so on. Remember their Nagler clones and the lawsuits with Celestron it just never ends. Seems like Celestron might have the better product. Anyone do areview on them. Oh and Meade does a lot of business with China aswellas Mexico. Just like Celestron.I don't think "just like Celestron". This is from Wikipedia "In early 2003 Celestron's rival, Meade Instruments <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meade_Instruments>, attempted a takeover but a bankruptcy court allowed the sale of the company back to its original owners. The company <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_%28law%29> had been U.S. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States> owned until April 2005 when it was acquired by SW Technology Corporation, a Delaware <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaware> company and affiliate of Synta Technology Corporation <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Synta_Technology_Corporation&a ction=edit&redlink=1> in China <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China>. Synta is a leading manufacturer of astronomy equipment and related components." So, apparently, Celestron is a Chinese owned company. Meade is not. Has Celestron's ownership changed since this was put out in Wikipedia? StanDwight -----Original Message----- From: Ken Sikes <KenGSikes@xxxxxxx> To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sat, Sep 5, 2009 2:11 pm Subject: [sac-forum] Re: MEADE ETX-LS 6" ACFLast year at the AASP there were two Meade reps demonstrating thenewestMeade telescopes,and even they admitted that Meade has lost some inthequality control department. I am not necessarily bashing Meade, as Ihavemany Meade products the most recent a Meade 16" Lightbridge purchased last May. My ETX-125 PE (made in China) never has worked the way it is supposed to electronically, even after a trip back to Meade for repairs. The opticsthemselves are top notch. The Lightbridge is made in Taiwan and thefewtimes I have been able to use it (due to weather) it has shown megreatviews.Did you read the review Mike wrote ? ......and by the way this isthethird telescope he has had to return to Meade, one of the twice. Ken Sikes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stan Gorodenski" <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 10:46 AM Subject: [sac-forum] Re: MEADE ETX-LS 6" ACFI'm not sure if Meade has once again dropped the ball and is 'true to form' as you claim, but Meade has produced good products, my LX75 10" and LX200R 16" being two of them. What's with all this anti-Meadebashing stuff? Is it because it is easy to criticize on theinternet?Ahidden motive? I still choose Meade over other companies that areChinese companies. One of them is very prominent in the currentissuesof S&T. Stan Ken Sikes wrote:Below is a link to a review of the recently released Meade ETX-LS .Thereview is by Mike Weasner and it seems that Meade is true to formandhasdropped the ball once again. http://www.weasner.com/etx/reviews/2009/etx-ls-6-acf.html Ken Sikes------------------------------------------------------------------------No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.78/2347 - Release Date:09/05/0905:51:00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.78/2347 - Release Date: 09/05/09 05:51:00 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.78/2347 - Release Date: 09/05/09 05:51:00