[sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- From: Paul Dickson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: SAC-Board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:44:17 -0700
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:37:32 -0700, Albert Stiewing wrote:
> 2. The 2005 budget is a worse case ( I hope), Income from individual dues
> currently shows 57 paid and 45 unpaid. In '04 we only lost 15 ind., 3
> newsletter and 5 family memberships. The current database shows 103
> individual, 15 Family, 1 honorary, and 3 newsletter members. We could
> increase income based on historical loss factors ( we have not lost more
> than 21 individual members in the last 4 years) However, we will still be
> cutting deeply into our savings account this year even with a more
> optimistic income forecast.
Al,
A tip for getting people to renew. Send them an E-mail directly (no
CC list, only one address in the From line) with the SAC Membership
Services Form attached.
I did that about two or three years ago. Most people ignored an earlier
message which had a bunch of addresses on the From list, but the second,
individual message got me a lot of replies.
This might be a lot of work for you (cut-n-pasting), but it will get
results.
You might do this after the February meeting.
-Paul
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- From: Tom Polakis
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- From: Albert Stiewing
- References:
- [sac-board] SAC Budget 2005
- From: Albert Stiewing
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- From: Tom Polakis
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Budget 2005
- From: Albert Stiewing
- [sac-board] SAC Budget 2005
- From: Albert Stiewing