[sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- From: rick.rotramel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:48:14 -0700
AJ,
Check your award records, I started drawing the SAC Best of the NGC objects
in 1985 or 1986, which means the list could have been around even earlier
than that.
I believe the list closely followed the best ngc objects in the Observer's
Handbook published in Canada.
Rick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cvsc1 [SMTP:cvsc1@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:02 PM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
>
>
> Thanks AJ
> Stan
>
> >Aj Wrote
> >
> >Stan, version 1.0, which should be on the web page, done by Steve Coe and
> myself is dated
> >January 1990.
> >
> >aj
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- From: AJ Crayon
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- From: AJ Crayon