[sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- From: AJ Crayon <acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:02:42 -0700
If you are looking for a date for Paul's book, then the 1990 date seems to
suffice. But I'd
prefer a more general wording for the page; perhap's something like the
following.
"The Saguaro Astronomy Club (SAC) maintained an observing list 'Best of the
NGC' since 1981
containing 100 objects. In 1990 it was updated and renamed '110 Best of the
NGC' before
appearing in Paul's excellent book."
For an indepth look at all the details see, SAC Observing Programs - Part One,
SAC Newsletter,
February 2000 on our web site. The March issue, containing Part Two, is not
yet on our web
site.
Hope this helps,
aj
cvsc1 wrote:
> AJ, Paul et all,
> Actually I was looking for a date for paul's book page.
>
>
> http://www.saguaroastro.org/content/Book_110BestOfNGC.htm
>
> Most of this info came of the SEDS site and the original said "for more than
> six years....."
> I am just looking for the most accurate way to state how long we have
> maintained this list.
>
> So do we stay at 1990 current version of list, or go with 1981 first list?
> Either way it's only a 30 second change.
> Thanks for all the input
>
> --
> have a great day, and a clear night
> Stan Clark
> 33.43N, 112.35 W
> Saguaro Astronomy Club
> Webmaster
> www.saguaroastro.org
> --
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- From: cvsc1
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- » [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- [sac-board] Re: Question: 110 best of NGC
- From: cvsc1