[rollei_list] Re: Scanner decision

  • From: Ruddy Roye <leicauser503@xxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:48:55 -0400

What do we know about the Konica Minolta that would make a pro buy it over the other two, the Nikon and the Microtek 120tf.
On Oct 14, 2005, at 5:28 AM, Per Ohstrom wrote:

The Konica Minolta is supposed to be good but a bit pricey. As is the Nikon 9000.

I have been thinking of the Epson F-3200 for a while. I think it is the cheapest film scanner for 120 format. Has anyone on the list any experience of this one?

Per


On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:21:52 +0200, Nick Roberts <nickbroberts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
I prefer the Konica Minolta Scan Multi Pro,
personally.
Nick
--- Ruddy Roye <leicauser503@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Does anyone have a preference or experience
between the Nikon coolscan
9000 and microtektf technologies. 

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


www.royephotography.com
Portrait and Editorial Photographer

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 10-2005