[rollei_list] Re: Scanner decision
- From: Per Ohstrom <ohstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:28:02 +0200
The Konica Minolta is supposed to be good but a bit pricey. As is the Nikon
9000.
I have been thinking of the Epson F-3200 for a while. I think it is the
cheapest film scanner for 120 format. Has anyone on the list any experience of
this one?
Per
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:21:52 +0200, Nick Roberts <nickbroberts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I prefer the Konica Minolta Scan Multi Pro,
> personally.
>Nick
>--- Ruddy Roye <leicauser503@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > Does anyone have a preference or experience
>> between the Nikon coolscan
>> > 9000 and microtektf technologies.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
