At 11:34 AM 4/20/06 -0400, Jan Decher wrote: >Finally. Classic Contaxes are fairly large, especially the prewar >versions. I briefly had a postwar IIIa and was surprised how bulky it >was compared to a Leica IIIf. The 1950s collapsible Zeiss Sonnars (2.0 >and 1.5) are also not as compact as the collapsible Elmars and >Summicrons of the Leica - though arguably better. Contax Viewfinders >are not as bright and clearly framed as modern Leica M, Cosina Bessa, >or Cosina/Zeiss Ikon ZM viewfinders but the rangefinder is very >accurate, IF well adjusted. Jan A couple of words of dissent. First, neither Carl Zeiss Jena nor Zeiss-Opton/Carl Zeiss ever produced a collapsible 1.5/50 Sonnar and the Postwar 2/50's are rigid though CZJ did produce the 2/50 in a collapsible mount until late in the war. All Postwar CZ production was of rigid lenses. Second, some late Prewar lenses are coated -- I have a coated 1.5/5cm CZJ Sonnar which was purchased new in Roanoke, Virginia, in 1937. Third, the Contax II and III combined VF/RF is every bit as crisp and bright as that on the latest Leica M if not better. Finally, the Contax RF does not really allow "adjustments" as does the LTM and M RF; it really requires a rather complete rebuild. Of the several hundred Contaxes I have examined over the years, I have yet to find one with an out-of-true RF. These things are built like tanks, which is why the Contax II was the accepted rough-country expedition camera through the War and for a decade afterwards. Marc msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! NEW FAX NUMBER: +540-343-8505 --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list