I think there are a lot of the older SLX type film holders out that don't have your problem. Is it possible the problem is unique to your camera? Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Slobodan Dimitrov Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 3:02 PM To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] Re: 6002 back Put it this way, try a new insert and see if there is a difference. I could you send you one to test with as I have several. Slobodan Dimitrov Studio G-8, AGCC http://sdimitrovphoto.com On Jun 13, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Alistair McGhee wrote: > Ouch - so goodbye to my inserts with the "hour glass" they are not > even > good for SLX users! Thanks for the info - I have never seen that > anywhere else. > > > > Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > > >> It's the inserts, not the backs that have been the problem. >> >> Slobodan Dimitrov >> Studio G-8, AGCC >> http://sdimitrovphoto.com >> >> >> >> On Jun 13, 2005, at 2:30 PM, Alistair McGhee wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> I thought the backs for the SLX and the 6002 were >>> interchangeable? In >>> fact I have an SLX 6 x 4.5 back on >>> the 6002 now while I get the 6002 back fixed. >>> >>> al >>> >>> Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> From your description, probably not. >>>> You might want to look at the inserts. If it has the hour glass >>>> icon >>>> on the side, throw them away as they were designed for the SLX. I'm >>>> really serious about throwing them away. The rivets on those extend >>>> slightly farther out to the sides and can cause the back to miss >>>> align. I've had plenty of experience with that happening. >>>> If you press the plate in the back and hold it down, you can run >>>> the >>>> roller through its cycle with your finger to see if the counter >>>> works. If it's sloppy like a Ford Comet but still runs through the >>>> numbers, it's still within tolerance. >>>> >>>> Slobodan Dimitrov >>>> Studio G-8, AGCC >>>> http://sdimitrovphoto.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 13, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Alistair McGhee wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Thanks Slobodan, >>>>> >>>>> Does that mean I might have broken the roller by forcing the back >>>>> shut? >>>>> >>>>> Al >>>>> --- >>>>> Rollei List >>>>> >>>>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' >>>>> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org >>>>> >>>>> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with >>>>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into >>>>> www.freelists.org >>>>> >>>>> - Online, searchable archives are available at >>>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> --- >>>> Rollei List >>>> >>>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' >>>> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org >>>> >>>> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with >>>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into >>>> www.freelists.org >>>> >>>> - Online, searchable archives are available at >>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________ NOD32 1.1138 (20050613) Information __________ >>>> >>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >>>> http://www.eset.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --- >>> Rollei List >>> >>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' >>> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org >>> >>> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with >>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into >>> www.freelists.org >>> >>> - Online, searchable archives are available at >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list >>> >>> >>> >>> >> --- >> Rollei List >> >> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' >> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org >> >> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with >> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into >> www.freelists.org >> >> - Online, searchable archives are available at >> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list >> >> >> __________ NOD32 1.1138 (20050613) Information __________ >> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> >> >> > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list