Holy SH!T! I really didn't realize that making a simple statement or question would turn into such a flame fest. Later all, Ron McGough Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID David Erbas-White <derbas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 3/8/2014 2:33 PM, Ron McGough wrote: > >Seriously, Ron? > >Do you have a crystal ball handy? > >I drove two hours out to the lakebed on Wednesday afternoon. At that time, >there was standing water in the road out to the launch site, and along the >edges of 247 (I'll be happy to send you the photos). > >Stepping onto what appeared to be the DRY spots, I would sink into the ground >about an inch. Stepping into the MOIST spots, my shoes got stuck. I didn't >bother stepping in the WET spots... > >My judgement at the time was that by Friday afternoon/Saturday morning, it >would be safe for cars, if they drove parallel to the main road in. I was >unsure whether it would be safe enough for trucks/trailers. > >Nobody could predict how much it would dry out, and I doubt if anyone would >have been able to make a 'good' judgement call by going out on Thursday, >either. > >Lacking perfect fortune-telling ability, the BOD elected to err on the side of >caution -- I'm disappointed as well, but I'm not going to kvetch about it. > >BTW (and I haven't told anyone this until this message), when I was leaving >the lakebed area, I had been careful to stay on the asphalt pad, but >accidentally had one wheel slip off onto the muck and DID get stuck briefly >with just one tire in! So, two days prior to folks coming out, the lakebed >was simply NOT DRIVABLE. > >While I appreciate folks that seem capable of 20-20 hindsight, and folks can >argue all day long as to whether they would have come out if it was even only >a 10% chance of being able to use the lakebed, the BOD has responsibilities to >everyone in toto. > >David Erbas-White > >P.S. In re-reading this I think some folks may get the idea that I'm on the >BOD -- I'm not. I'm simply an interested rocketeer who took the time to drive >for four hours during the middle of my work day in order to provide the FACTS >about the status of the lakebed Wednesday afternoon, in order to let the BOD >use that information to the best of their ability. > > >If its so nice then why was the ROC BOD so misinformed? I was looking forward >to going up and flying a couple K hybrids but canceled when it was reported >that the lake bed was still a lake. > > >Ron McGough > > >Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID > > > >R Dierking <applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Amy is a little disappointed because there's not enough wind for her kite. >Clear and temp is 72F. One of the most pleasant days I've seen here. > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:59 PM, "R Dierking" <applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Lakebed is in excellent condition and weather is very nice. Tried to post >> earlier but didn't go through. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> -- >> ROC-Chat mailing list >> roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat >> > >-- >ROC-Chat mailing list >roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat > >