[roc-chat] Re: Lakebed Report

  • From: Ron McGough <rrmagoo7@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 16:44:56 -0800

Holy SH!T! I really didn't realize that making a simple statement or question 
would turn into such a flame fest.

Later all,
Ron McGough

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

David Erbas-White <derbas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 3/8/2014 2:33 PM, Ron McGough wrote:
>
>Seriously, Ron?
>
>Do you have a crystal ball handy?
>
>I drove two hours out to the lakebed on Wednesday afternoon.  At that time, 
>there was standing water in the road out to the launch site, and along the 
>edges of 247 (I'll be happy to send you the photos).
>
>Stepping onto what appeared to be the DRY spots, I would sink into the ground 
>about an inch.  Stepping into the MOIST spots, my shoes got stuck.  I didn't 
>bother stepping in the WET spots...
>
>My judgement at the time was that by Friday afternoon/Saturday morning, it 
>would be safe for cars, if they drove parallel to the main road in.  I was 
>unsure whether it would be safe enough for trucks/trailers.
>
>Nobody could predict how much it would dry out, and I doubt if anyone would 
>have been able to make a 'good' judgement call by going out on Thursday, 
>either.
>
>Lacking perfect fortune-telling ability, the BOD elected to err on the side of 
>caution -- I'm disappointed as well, but I'm not going to kvetch about it.
>
>BTW (and I haven't told anyone this until this message), when I was leaving 
>the lakebed area, I had been careful to stay on the asphalt pad, but 
>accidentally had one wheel slip off onto the muck and DID get stuck briefly 
>with just one tire in!  So, two days prior to folks coming out, the lakebed 
>was simply NOT DRIVABLE.
>
>While I appreciate folks that seem capable of 20-20 hindsight, and folks can 
>argue all day long as to whether they would have come out if it was even only 
>a 10% chance of being able to use the lakebed, the BOD has responsibilities to 
>everyone in toto.
>
>David Erbas-White
>
>P.S. In re-reading this I think some folks may get the idea that I'm on the 
>BOD -- I'm not.  I'm simply an interested rocketeer who took the time to drive 
>for four hours during the middle of my work day in order to provide the FACTS 
>about the status of the lakebed Wednesday afternoon, in order to let the BOD 
>use that information to the best of their ability.
>
>
>If its so nice then why was the ROC BOD so misinformed? I was looking forward 
>to going up and flying a couple K hybrids but canceled when it was reported 
>that the lake bed was still a lake.
>
>
>Ron McGough
>
>
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
>
>
>
>R Dierking <applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Amy is a little disappointed because there's not enough wind for her kite.
>Clear and temp is 72F.  One of the most pleasant days I've seen here.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:59 PM, "R Dierking" <applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Lakebed is in excellent condition and weather is very nice.  Tried to post 
>> earlier but didn't go through.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> -- 
>> ROC-Chat mailing list
>> roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
>> 
>
>--
>ROC-Chat mailing list
>roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
>
>

Other related posts: