On 18 Aug, in article <1a79cfd04f.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In message <7807e9cc4f.oramj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > John Oram <oramj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My enquiries before purchasing the iP4200 led me to believe that Epson > > were a non-starter since they seemed not very forthcoming at releasing > > information to allow Martin W. to build matching Gutenprint drivers, > > so I moved to Canon and have been quite happy with the results with my > > photography. > Quite to the contrary, Gutenprint is very much geared towards Epson > printers because from the start Epson have been much more forthcoming > at releasing information. The key Gutenprint developer mainly works on > the Epson drivers. The Gutenprint Canon drivers are significantly > lower quality than the Epson ones because they have received much less > attention over the years. When you say 'significantly lower quality', will the difference only be noticeable when printing high-resolution photos, or also when printing text with the occasional low-res colour? > Secondly, it is worth noting that I do not create any drivers at all > nor do I consult any vendor information about printers. I only make > the work of the Gutenprint team available for RISC OS and I am not > involved in the actual development of the Gutenprint drivers. Yup, I understand that. Martin A -- Martin Avison using a British Iyonix running RISC OS 5 and the Pluto mail and newsreader ------------------------------------------------------------ To change, suspend or cancel your subscription go to //www.freelists.org/list/riscos-printing ------------------------------------------------------------