[pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- From: "rob c" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:46:49 +0100
The answer depends on who you talk to.
the two flatbeds currently being talked about are the epson 4990 and the canon
9900f
check out http://www.photo-i.co.uk/ where there are reviews on both.
The main difference seems to be that the canon comes equipped with medium
format holders which let you scan 2 strips of 6x6 in one go whereas the epson
requires third party film holders for this. epson software is better but
everyone seems to think silverfast is better anyway so in my view the canon is
a better purchase. Both are cheap and are reported to give excellent results
for medium format and up. For 35mm negs a dedicated film scanner is a better
choice.
rob
At 26/06/2005 10:19 -0400, you wrote:
>June 2605 from Lloyd Erlick
>
>I've been using a flatbed scanner for my negatives for several years now.
>Only to replace contact sheets, that is. I find it far superior, and a lot
>easier on the eyes.
>
>My scanner has been a HP 4C with transparency lid, but it is about ten
>years old now. I've been planning to set up my old computer to do nothing
>but run the scanner, but it turns out that is merely an invitation to
>return to Windows 95 hell. Yesterday I spent about six hours on it, and I'm
>willing to admit I'm an incompetent nincompoop if it will just get me away
>from this drudgery.
>
>I'm willing to part with a bit of cash to get a decent USB type flatbed
>scanner. I need to be able to scan 8.5x11 neg filing pages without removing
>or handling the negs.
>
>Is there a consensus on which machine I should get??
>
>Thank you very much.
>
>(By the way, I've also asked this question on r.p.darkroom.)
>
>regards,
>--le
>________________________________
>Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
>voice: 416-686-0326
>email: portrait@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>net: www.heylloyd.com
>________________________________
>--
>
>
>=============================================================================================================
>To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
>account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
>and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- From: Michael Briggs
- References:
- [pure-silver] Direct toners- the Viradon mystery
- From: Christopher Woodhouse
- [pure-silver] scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- From: Lloyd Erlick
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- » [pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- » [pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- » [pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- » [pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- » [pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- » [pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- [pure-silver] Re: scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- From: Michael Briggs
- [pure-silver] Direct toners- the Viradon mystery
- From: Christopher Woodhouse
- [pure-silver] scanner recommendations (not OT!)
- From: Lloyd Erlick