[pure-silver] Re: help with finding an 4x5" enlarger
- From: Gianni Rondinini <bugbarbeq@xxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:48:16 +0100
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:09:22 -0500, you (Lloyd Erlick
<lloyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>) wrote:
>I've been using an L1200 for a decade. I bought it brand new, and I went a
>little overboard on the trimmings. I bought all the little doodads that
[...]
>work the price down. I think it's still possible to buy anti-Newton
>negative carrier glasses from Durst if a new one seems in order.
this is a very good suggestion. thanks lloyd.
since you've used it longly with all the accessories, i trust in the
fact longer/shorter exposures don't make that difference.
and i'd like to say once more, since i know some friends of a similar
italian list are subscribed to this one, too, that i'm quite a newbie
in darkroom, then i probably wouldn't able to notice any difference.
i fell a little bit ashamed saying this, but i have 2 different
condensers for my agfa enlarger and can't find *any* difference
between them. i know one is for 135 and one is for 120->6x9, but i
can't figure out which.
>But if I had to use condenser, I'd definitely see if the 4x5 condenser set
>did the trick for smaller formats. The added brightness just isn't worth
>the huge money.
ok, thank you once more.
regards,
--
Gianni Rondinini (30, tanti, RA)
Nikon user - Bmw driver
http://bugbarbeq.deviantart.com
============================================================================================================To
unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account
(the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and
unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
