I thought I'd share my solution to the problem with pinholes/pinlines on lith. We had a good thread last week with lots of comments and suggestions about "normal" holey-ness of lith emulsions, pH of developers as a possible cause, activity of different developers, and pH of alkaline fixers; even a possible role for the use of hardening fixers to overcome emulsion defects. I have to admit I didn't test / investigate all those suggestions. But thanks for the ideas as I learned a lot from the discussion. One result I reported last week was that the "holes" appeared to decrease in abundance when I exposed the emulsion to greater degrees; the difference was very signficant, and it lead me to try that strategy to overcome the problem. I also said that using shorter exposures coupled with longer developing time did nothing for reducing the number of holes/lines, even tho max density was greater. I'm using lith to make masks and these require lots of density. Guidance on making them was to make an interpositive that looked like a "weak" positive of the negative. I earlier used a 5 second contact exposure and 5 min development. The mask I created from this interpositive was exposed at 10 sec and developed 5 minutes: this gave me a mask full of obvious pinholes/lineholes in the densest parts of the mask. Over the weekend I took a different approach. I made a more contrasty interpostive by exposing at 20 seconds and developing for 1.5 - 2 minutes. I then contact exposed the mask using this interpositive for 40 seconds, and developed it for 2 minutes. The result was a dense mask where I wanted it dense and zero density where I wanted zero.. and very very few pinholes, which were very very small. This I think I can live with. I have no explanation for this effect except this. When I examined the pinholes/pinlines under magnification (thanks Ryuji), they looked like 'tiny dust particles"... I suspected that not seeing them with added exposure might be due to more light bouncing around and under them, exposing more of the emulsion with more light, and thereby reducing their blocking effects. I was very careful to remove what dust I could before exposure, but these looked as it they came embedded on / in the emulsion or way too small to remove by physical means. Anyway, that was my fix to the problem.. hope it helps someone else. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Black" <jblack@xxxxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 9:42 AM Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Silverholes... was Pinholes in Lith > >> >> TF-3 is just sodium metaborate and sodium sulfite. According to the 20 > mule >> team people a 0.5% solution of Sodium metaborate gives a pH of 10.8 at > 20C. >> So the question is how much does the hypo and sulfite change that? > > > Na metaborate (Kodalk) and Na sulfite in a ratio of 4:1 by weight gives a > pH > of about 10.00. I would not want to use a fixer, or any post develop > traetment at this pH. NH4 thiosulfate works just fine at just above > neutrality. > > JB > > > > > >> >> Nick >> > ============================================================================ > ================================= >> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. >> > > > ============================================================================================================= > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. > ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.