[pure-silver] My Negatives Not as Contrasty As Prints
- From: ERoustom <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:43:41 -0400
Greetings PS members,
I don't expect a perfect answer to this silly question, but I'm
curious what any of you would have to say.
I have a roll of negatives that look perfect on the light table - I
see detail in the shadows and the highlights, everything is sharp
with good contrast - the highlights don't look as dense as they
print, but they take a good deal of work to print. If the negative
looks good on the light table, why should it be so contrasty on the
paper?
Happy Labor Day.
Elias
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] new darkroom floor
- From: Shannon Stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: My Negatives Not as Contrasty As Prints
- From: Ken Hart1
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] My Negatives Not as Contrasty As Prints
- » [pure-silver] Re: My Negatives Not as Contrasty As Prints
- » [pure-silver] Re: My Negatives Not as Contrasty As Prints
- [pure-silver] new darkroom floor
- From: Shannon Stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: My Negatives Not as Contrasty As Prints
- From: Ken Hart1