[pure-silver] Re: Developing Kodak Royal Pan

  • From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:19:54 -0400

Cor is right about over exposure but, if I were to bleach, I would not over
develop as most common ferricyanide bleaches are cutting bleaches and
increase contrast.  I would over expose, either dev normally or, as Cor
suggested, under dev a little, then bleach back.
             CHEERS!
                         BOB

-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of C.Breukel@xxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 8:54 AM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Developing Kodak Royal Pan

A few options:

Over expose and under develop might suppress B+F a bit.

A clean working developer might help (FX-37) might help.

Overdevelop and bleach back the B+F with Farmer.

Tried all these things on a free box of 8*10 HP5+ which had a high B+F, all
helped a bit, but guess what: slightly overexpose and process normal and
print through the B+F worked actually pretty good also!

Good luck,

Best,

Cor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Daneliuk
> Sent: donderdag 14 juni 2012 14:45
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Developing Kodak Royal Pan
> 
> On 06/14/2012 07:04 AM, Martin magid wrote:
> > It turned out the box was indeed factory sealed, with four sealed
> packages inside the box, each with 25 sheets of film. I opened one and
> took out two sheets from the middle of the group.  One of them was
> developed without exposing it to any light, and the other was developed
> after exposing it for a minute to full outside light.  I used D-76 stock
> for 8 minutes, close to 68F.
> >
> > The unexposed sheet turned out to have a lot of base fog, looks about
> like a Kodak Gray Card.  The exposed sheet developed to a nearly opaque
> black.  If I put it right next to a bare 150 watt light bulb, I can just
> barely see the bulb.  The black negative would be useful for making a
> cliche-verre print. :)  I had some fun doing that quite a few years ago,
> but deliberately blackened fresh film at that time.  With 98 sheets left,
> I have enough to become pretty good at it.
> >
> > The instruction sheet that was inside the box was dated 11-86. The
> developing instructions matched what Richard Knoppow found.
> >
> > Any other thoughts on useful applications for this film would be
> appreciated.  The investment was, fortunately, fairly small.
> >
> > Marty
> 
> I wonder if a judicious application of Benzotriazole might be in
> order.  I doubt you'd be able to fully suppress the fog, but you
> might be able to calm it down some.
> 
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tim Daneliuk
> ==========================================================================
> ===================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
====================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to
www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and
password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7221 (20120614) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: