Cor is right about over exposure but, if I were to bleach, I would not over develop as most common ferricyanide bleaches are cutting bleaches and increase contrast. I would over expose, either dev normally or, as Cor suggested, under dev a little, then bleach back. CHEERS! BOB -----Original Message----- From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of C.Breukel@xxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 8:54 AM To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Developing Kodak Royal Pan A few options: Over expose and under develop might suppress B+F a bit. A clean working developer might help (FX-37) might help. Overdevelop and bleach back the B+F with Farmer. Tried all these things on a free box of 8*10 HP5+ which had a high B+F, all helped a bit, but guess what: slightly overexpose and process normal and print through the B+F worked actually pretty good also! Good luck, Best, Cor > -----Original Message----- > From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver- > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Daneliuk > Sent: donderdag 14 juni 2012 14:45 > To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Developing Kodak Royal Pan > > On 06/14/2012 07:04 AM, Martin magid wrote: > > It turned out the box was indeed factory sealed, with four sealed > packages inside the box, each with 25 sheets of film. I opened one and > took out two sheets from the middle of the group. One of them was > developed without exposing it to any light, and the other was developed > after exposing it for a minute to full outside light. I used D-76 stock > for 8 minutes, close to 68F. > > > > The unexposed sheet turned out to have a lot of base fog, looks about > like a Kodak Gray Card. The exposed sheet developed to a nearly opaque > black. If I put it right next to a bare 150 watt light bulb, I can just > barely see the bulb. The black negative would be useful for making a > cliche-verre print. :) I had some fun doing that quite a few years ago, > but deliberately blackened fresh film at that time. With 98 sheets left, > I have enough to become pretty good at it. > > > > The instruction sheet that was inside the box was dated 11-86. The > developing instructions matched what Richard Knoppow found. > > > > Any other thoughts on useful applications for this film would be > appreciated. The investment was, fortunately, fairly small. > > > > Marty > > I wonder if a judicious application of Benzotriazole might be in > order. I doubt you'd be able to fully suppress the fog, but you > might be able to calm it down some. > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tim Daneliuk > ========================================================================== > =================================== > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. ====================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7221 (20120614) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.