On Thursday 11 February 2010, Benjamin I Krefetz wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Simon Osborne wrote: > > Also, while we're on the subject, the above fix would also fix the > > following: > > > > BOOK 25: > > (er) The Story So Far: which comprise of -> which comprise OR which > > are comprised of > > ["Rimoah informed you that Gazad Helkona is occupied by Xaol and > > his cohorts, which comprise of Hammerland bandits and remnants of > > the army of Darklord Chlanzor, the former ruler of this > > city-fortress."] > > I'd say this is a different situation because, semantics aside, > "which comprise of" is straight out grammatically incorrect. Also, > in this case, either "which comprise" or "which are composed of" > don't look awkward (at least to me), so I don't think we need to be > going to the thesaurus here :) "which are composed of" sounds weird to my (German) ears. I wouldn't use "composed of" in combination with groups of people or animals. I'd only use it for things. So, I vote for using "which comprise". Regards, Ingo ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon