Hi Rick, EdSharp is written in C#. But you can use any language (Jamal, please correct if necessary) that .Net supports. For example, I have the command line visual basic compiler and the command line JScript compiler on this computer. I could write something that processes text in my document or a converter that compiles to an executable and make EdSharp use it. Thanks. Jim Jim Homme, Usability Services, Phone: 412-544-1810. Skype: jim.homme Internal recipients, Read my accessibility blog. Discuss accessibility here. Accessibility Wiki: Breaking news and accessibility advice -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of RicksPlace Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:10 AM To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Quest for the Perfect Text Editor Hi: Is that .net code? If so is it vb.net or csharp or what? Someone mentioned .net before but I am not sure about it. I am just interested a little to see how it was developed. Rick USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:14 AM Subject: Re: Quest for the Perfect Text Editor > You -could- write code, but adding to a file of 12k lines with minimal > documentation and horrible coding is kind of hard to do. I had to spend > hours to get the thing to not take 30 seconds to start up. I like edsharp, > but now a lot less so now that I've seen how the code under the hood > works. It doesn't change that it is a good editor, just kind of shines and > shows why the problems that exist do exist for me. > On 11/29/2010 4:58 AM, Homme, James wrote: >> Hi Kerneels, >> I'm unsure how you'd define the perfect text editor, but in my view, and >> I've put it through a lot of its paces, EdSharp is my editor of choice. >> Second choice for me is NoteTab or NoteTab Pro if you want to spend the >> $29 US. I'd recommend that you do that if you use NoteTab. It has >> extremely powerful features. But EdSharp talks better out of the box, >> because it was written for people who are blind. And you can spend the >> time to customize it the way you want it to work if you are willing to >> write code that hooks into it, because it offers you most of .Net to play >> with. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Jim >> >> Jim Homme, >> Usability Services, >> Phone: 412-544-1810. Skype: jim.homme >> Internal recipients, Read my accessibility blog. Discuss accessibility >> here. Accessibility Wiki: Breaking news and accessibility advice >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kerneels Roos >> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 4:02 AM >> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Quest for the Perfect Text Editor >> >> Hi list, >> I'm looking for some great programmer's text editors that are >> compattible with NVDA and/or JAWS. Since the latest NVDA seems to have >> some significant improvements over previous versions, I was wondering >> which text editors might now also become compattible with NVDA. It would >> actualy be a good idea to setup a few pages with tables comparing how >> well each editor works with all the diferent screen readers. Such a >> comparison database would be a great idea for a one stop refernce for >> many kinds of applications, but I thought the most important one for a >> programmer is definately a good text editor. >> >> Would other members on this list be interested in and/or willing to >> assist in compiling such a database? >> >> I think it could save a lot of time and effort for all of us if there >> could be a one stop database with profiles of useful applications, >> categorised by the job they perform and how well they perform that job. >> To start off, it could be limited to apps useful to programmers and text >> editors in particular. >> >> Regards. >> >> -- >> Kerneels Roos >> Cell: +27 (0)82 309 1998 >> Skype: cornelis.roos >> >> >> >> __________ >> View the list's information and change your settings at >> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >> >> >> This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended >> solely for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. >> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender >> immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, >> you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without >> the author's prior permission. The views expressed in this e-mail >> message do not necessarily represent the views of Highmark Inc., its >> subsidiaries, or affiliates. >> __________ >> View the list's information and change your settings at >> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >> >> > > > -- > > Thanks, > Ty > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind