-=PCTechTalk=- Re: Windows (98se) Protection Error
- From: Foxhillers@xxxxxxx
- To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:55:27 EDT
Well, it's up and running now with 256 k PC133 chips in Banks 0 and 2.....
Bank 1 is empty. The two 128 chips were PC100 and PC133, so mismatch speed
should not have been an issue. The motherboard manual indicates that different
chip sizes are ok.
Now, is there benefit to be achieved by trying to get this WIN98se system up
to 754? I have another chip in an unopened package.
thanks
mjh
In a message dated 8/26/03 10:07:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Foxhillers@xxxxxxx writes:
> In a message dated 8/26/03 9:12:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> stormy1@xxxxxxx
> writes:
>
> > maybe they don't "like" each other? I've had that happen. If it was working
> > fine before you put the new chip in and now its not, that just seems the
> > most logical cause of the problem. The best way to find out is take the new
> > chip out and if it works fine again then you need to find out what your
> > other options are for ram. Even though the memory shows up as being there
> it
> > may not be functioning properly.
> >
> > ~Lacey~
> >
> Hiya Lacey
> Well, it sure looks like the problem is in Bank 1. The system runs fine
> with the original 128 in Bank 0 and the 256 in Bank 2. Putting the other
> 128
> chip that had been in Bank 2 and both of the other chips into Bank 1 causes
> Windows to show Explorer errors.
>
> Any idea of how to verify this or to persuade Bank 1 to join in the fun?
>
> mjh
>
>
To unsub or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
For more info:
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk
Other related posts:
