[pchelpers] Re: Re Fw: A question that needs answering
- From: "Ed" <edwest@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:41:22 -0500
I don't see calling this a hoax. Because it was presented via email doesn't
make it less viable does it? How does one present such a thing to the UN?
Because the UN doesn't acknowledge it doesn't mean they didn't receive it or
even like it. Politicians always tell the truth! Many a politically favored
position was put in the "bank" to be brought out at a more favorable date.
Similar proposals have been made & all is a further sign of the times I
believe. The climate is apparently getting to this point. A big push & it
may be allowed to be accomplished by Jehovah. Time will tell won't it?:~ )
From: "rweyer" <rweyer@xxxxxxxxx>
> Here is the very latest in the saga of the proposed draft resolution
offered
> to the UN regarding the destruction of organized religion. Included (
> below) is a statement from Formulism, the authors of the resolution.
> Remember this; for the resolution to be submitted and accepted for
> consideration is two entirely different things. Many different proposals
> may be offered every day. However most of them never even get mentioned.
> This one is of much interest to us. However, there seems to be no climate
> of acceptance YET for this proposal. One day soon a proposal similar to
> this one will be approved and acted on. When? We do not know.
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at //www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
Other related posts:
