[pchelpers] Re Fw: A question that needs answering
- From: "rweyer" <rweyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Newday" <newdayiscoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"JWAssociation" <JWAssociation@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"whoweare" <jws-whoweare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"JWArtist" <JWArtists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"pioneergal" <worldparadise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:30:20 -0600
Here is the very latest in the saga of the proposed draft resolution offered
to the UN regarding the destruction of organized religion. Included (
below) is a statement from Formulism, the authors of the resolution.
Remember this; for the resolution to be submitted and accepted for
consideration is two entirely different things. Many different proposals
may be offered every day. However most of them never even get mentioned.
This one is of much interest to us. However, there seems to be no climate
of acceptance YET for this proposal. One day soon a proposal similar to
this one will be approved and acted on. When? We do not know.
Bob Weyer
____________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "tnpudding" <tnpuddin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Newday" <newdayiscoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "JWAssociation"
<JWAssociation@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "whoweare" <jws-whoweare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"JWArtist" <JWArtists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "pioneergal"
<worldparadise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 9:39 PM
Subject: [pchelpers] Fw: A question that needs answering
> As you can see below I wrote the org, that supposedly made the proposal
and
> presented it to the UN. I had to laugh since the news report and this org
> site make it appear they personally presented it at the UN when they
> actually sent it via e-mail. Regardless it does show a trend and this in
> itself is encouraging but as in all things we must leave the time for his
> will to be done in his capable hands.
>
>
> Penelope
> ©1-24-04
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Formulist Community" <formulist_community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "tnpudding" <tnpuddin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 7:12 PM
> Subject: Re: A question that needs answering
>
>
>
> Thank you for your message.
>
> I am aware that the UN has denied receiving our proposal (sent via
e-mail)
> and will therefore be
> sending it again today.
>
> Antony
>
> --- tnpudding <tnpuddin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > why are you perpetrating a
hoax
> the Un says is not
> true?
>
>
>
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at //www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
Other related posts:
