Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- From: Mogens Nørrgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: tim@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:18:50 +0100
Tim Gorman wrote:
>>This guy explains also latchless SCN in some details.
>>Great idea, like every transaction own 255 SCN
>>numbers, then no need to take the latch :)
>>
>>
>
>At least, no need to take the latch quite so *often*...
>
>Not only that, but "this guy" is also one heckuva first-time snowboarder, as
>we discovered the day after the RMOUG conference last week.
>
>I was supposed to be teaching him (my only opportunity to do so in any
>endeavor), and he skipped all that to go straight up on the lift by himself,
>not 15 minutes after stepping onto a ski area for the very first time. He
>ended the day doing aerials, rodeos, and end-o's...
>
>And he's brilliant besides?
>
>--
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>
Well, Tanel is apparently fearless: I believe that he once, together
with some friends, went down the highest hill/mountain in Estonia in one
of those roof boxes you put on top of your car for extra luggage, ski,
etc...
Mogens
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- From: Tim Gorman
Other related posts:
- » latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- » Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- Re: latch-free SCN scheme (10.1.0.3)
- From: Tim Gorman