Re: Standby on Same box
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:31:48 +0000
well for protection against loss of the original box, it's obviously not a
great plan! It might provide some protection against logical corruption (the
mythical 'junior dba' for example) if configured with a delay.
As far as switchover/switchback goes - that operation doesn't involve a
rebuild - though failover does.
Niall Litchfield
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Howard Latham <howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Oracle 10g and 11g.
>
> REDHAT LInux
>
> I have just been told by a consultant that a standby on the same box
> as a primary is not recommended.(We also have a standby on another
> box) My feeling is that will speedup a rebuild should we ever have to
> switch over and switch back.Any views?
>
>
>
> --
> Howard A. Latham
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
Other related posts:
