Re: Standby on Same box
- From: Maureen English <sxmte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:31:48 -0900
I agree with the other comments regarding having a standby that is planned for use as a failover on a different box. However, we've been considering having a logical standby on the same box, where its purpose would be simply a reporting database. - Maureen Howard Latham wrote:
Oracle 10g and 11g. REDHAT LInux I have just been told by a consultant that a standby on the same box as a primary is not recommended.(We also have a standby on another box) My feeling is that will speedup a rebuild should we ever have to switch over and switch back.Any views?
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standby on Same box
- From: Howard Latham
- Re: Standby on Same box
- References:
- Standby on Same box
- From: Howard Latham
- Standby on Same box
Other related posts:
- » Standby on Same box - Howard Latham
- » RE: Standby on Same box - Ric Van Dyke
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Standby on Same box - D'Hooge Freek
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Guillermo Alan Bort
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Howard Latham
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Standby on Same box - kathy duret
- » RE: Standby on Same box - Newman, Christopher
- » RE: Standby on Same box - D'Hooge Freek
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Niall Litchfield
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Jared Still
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Maureen English
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Howard Latham
- » Re: Standby on Same box - kathy duret
- » RE: Standby on Same box - D'Hooge Freek
- » Re: Standby on Same box - Guillermo Alan Bort