RE: RMAN question
- From: "Alvaro Jose Fernandez" <alvaro.fernandez@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <joseph.armstrong-champ@xxxxxxxxx>, "ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:47:27 +0200
Hi Joe,
I say the logic is correct, with one possible caveat that you would not
wan't to stay in this situation too long, if the controlfile record
capacity has "wrapped"/overflowed over the one-week default for backup
info, you will losing the oldest entries about backups. It depends of
the "window" needed of recoverability. controfile_keep_record_time
global init.ora setting.
>Question: Does anyone see anything wrong with our logic in saying that
>even if a restore using the new repository failed we could always use
>the cf? Do people test their backups when all that changes is the
>repository being used? We are not changing the version of oracle that
is
>being used to run the rman command so the cf repository isn't changing.
>Basically we are only risking our redundancy.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
