Re: Oracle10g SQL
- From: Adam Donahue <adonahue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:06:13 -0500
Paul,
When I get a little time tomorrow, I'll post the three apparent SQL bugs
I've encountered in the last week alone. At this point my confidence in
Oracle 10g is quickly declining. (Yes, laugh, laugh, that I had any
confidence in a new Oracle release to begin with.) The main point of
the post -- which apparently pissed more people off than it should have
-- was to ask if there was any other anecdotal evidence out there that
Oracle10g has some SQL-related problems (more so than any other new
Oracle release I've used from Oracle 7.3 on).
Adam
Paul Drake wrote:
>Adam,
>
>funny. we're migrating away from 9.2.0.6 to get to "things fixed in 10.1.0".
>guess it depends upon how you look at it.
>it sure beats waiting around for "when is 9.2.0.7 due out?" but will
>inevitably lead to "when is 10.1.0.4 due out?".
>
>Paul
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
