Re: Oracle installation on Local disk vs. SAN
- From: "April Sims" <sims@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Oracle-L Freelists" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:00:39 -0600
Everyone,
Is there any physical limits you would be up against? The number of instances
per ORACLE_HOME?
April Sims
SELECT IOUG Contributing Editor
http://aprilcsims.wordpress.com
OCP 8i, 9i, 10g DBA
Southern Utah University
sims@xxxxxxx
940-484-4276
>>> William Wagman <wjwagman@xxxxxxxxxxx> 5/14/2009 1:30 PM >>>
Greetings,
We have just purchased a new very large SAN to which we will be migrating
several databases. There are also two new servers which will be connected to
this SAN. We will be running RHEL5 and Oracle 11g. We are in the midst of a
discussion with the system administrator who wants us to install Oracle on the
SAN rather than the local disk on the new server. We, the DBAs would like to
have it installed on the local disk, of which there is plenty.
We are wondering about the pros and cons of installing Oracle on the local disk
versus the SAN. All comments appreciated.
Thanks.
Bill Wagman
Univ. of California at Davis
IET Campus Data Center
wjwagman@xxxxxxxxxxx
(530) 754-6208
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
