Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco wrote: > I definetively think if Oracle decides to develop an OS which could > work as an os database and a normal operating system. Only if I get my beloved bash shell via a KDE Konsole GUI interface in this new o/s. :-) > Linux is interesting, but I don't have time to build the puzzle, > seeking components, installing and testing. I expect something already > done and tested. That's a very wrong and some what warped view of Linux. It was true more than 10 years ago (where it took me most of the night to build a custom kernel on a i386sx ;-). Today, it is not. It works out of the box. It works better than Solaris. Better than HP-UX. It offers me as Oracle DBA/software engineer a host of features and options that I either do not have on other Unix flavours, or have to pay extra for. If I have to fail Linux for anything, it is the lack of a HP-UX Glance-like performance monitoring tool/scripting engine. But Glance alone does not make HP-UX for example a better choice for me than Linux. I look (as DBA) after a couple of Solaris boxes, a handful of HP-UX boxes, and over 30 Linux boxes (clustered and stand-alone, web servers and Oracle). I do all my development on Linux. And if I have my way, management will replace the others too with Linux (which is not bloody likely to happen, but I can fanatasize, can't I? :-) -- Billy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited e-mail legal notice available at http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l