RE: Is RAC DOA?
- From: DENNIS WILLIAMS <DWILLIAMS@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:57:40 -0500
Pete - Thanks for that explanation. I was one of those assuming Grid <=>
RAC.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
"We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means
doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case,
the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive."
-- C.S. Lewis
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Pete Sharman
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 1:57 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Peter Ross Sharman
Subject: RE: Is RAC DOA?
Yep. You're missing the simple fact that grid is bigger than RAC. Sure, R=
AC enables a lot of the grid technology but you can also have non-clustered=
databases in a grid environment on different OS's. Add Streams and the ab=
ility to have cross platform transportable tablespaces and you'll see more =
of the overall grid environment.
=
Pete
=
"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
=
"Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!"
Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] =
On Behalf Of Daniel Fink
Sent: Tuesday, 17 August 2004 4:46 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is RAC DOA?
Extend that question into the realm of 'grid' computing. RAC requires a het=
erogeneous environment within the cluster. This means =
that a RAC cluster is not really grid friendly. It is only able to 'shift' =
processing requirements within itself and cannot take =
advantage of that underutilized server sitting next to it in the data cente=
r. I asked this question of an Oracle employee recently =
and the response was that RAC does indeed fit into Oracle's grid strategy, =
but there are not any plans to enable a homogenous RAC =
system. Am I missing something?
Daniel
Jesse, Rich wrote:
> I'll add that until <buzzword>hetergeneous clusters</buzzword> are suppor=
ted, your availability is only good until your next patch (Oracle, OS, or 3=
rd party). When you patch one, you most likely need to patch all at the sa=
me time. In the case of Oracle patches, it's mandatory at least thru 9.2.
> Rich
> =
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 10:48 AM
> Subject: RE: Is RAC DOA?
> =
> =
> One slight quibble, regarding increased availability.
> =
> [snip]
> =
> mwf
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
