RE: Is RAC DOA?
- From: "Mercadante, Thomas F" <thomas.mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:14:30 -0400
LOL!! I had to go to the dictionary for that one!
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional
-----Original Message-----
From: Poras, Henry R. [mailto:Henry_Poras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 3:09 PM
To: 'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: Is RAC DOA?
Rolling patches brings Dante's Inferno to mind. A Sisyphusian endevour if
there ever was one.
Henry
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Pete Sharman
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 2:21 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Peter Ross Sharman
Subject: RE: Is RAC DOA?
Individual patches are now being marked as rolling upgradeable (damn that's=
an awful phrase!) I think that's what Raj means.
=
Pete
=
"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
=
"Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!"
Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] =
On Behalf Of Jesse, Rich
Sent: Tuesday, 17 August 2004 4:16 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Is RAC DOA?
Any specific cases you could mention? This has been one of the sore =3D
spots for us with RAC.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 11:44 AM
Subject: RE: Is RAC DOA?
Not true in call cases ...
Raj
--- "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'll add that until <buzzword>hetergeneous clusters</buzzword> are =3D
supported, your availability
> is only good until your next patch (Oracle, OS, or 3rd party). When
> =3D
you patch one, you most
> likely need to patch all at the same time. In the case of Oracle =3D
patches, it's mandatory at
> least thru 9.2.
> Rich
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put
'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put
'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put
'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Is RAC DOA?
- From: Mark W. Farnham
Other related posts:
- » Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » Re: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- » RE: Is RAC DOA?
- RE: Is RAC DOA?
- From: Mark W. Farnham